Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Comparison of single- versus two-stent techniques in treatment of unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease
Won-Jang Kim1, Young-Hak Kim, Duk-Woo Park
1Department of Cardiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
The single-stent technique for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in distal unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease demonstrated superior 3-year outcomes. This approach significantly reduced risks of myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events compared to the two-stent method.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Disease Research
- Drug-Eluting Stent Technology
Background:
- Distal unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease presents complex treatment challenges.
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) are commonly used for LMCA interventions.
- Comparing single- versus two-stent strategies is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 3-year clinical outcomes of single-stent versus two-stent techniques in patients with distal unprotected LMCA disease treated with DES.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different stenting strategies in this high-risk population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 392 patients with distal unprotected LMCA disease undergoing DES implantation.
- Patients were divided into single-stent (n=234) and two-stent (n=158) groups.
- Weighted Cox regression analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to adjust for baseline differences.
Main Results:
- The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR).
- While 3-year mortality was similar between groups (HR, 0.77; P=0.62), the single-stent group showed significantly lower risks of MI (HR, 0.38; P=0.008), TLR (HR, 0.16; P=0.005), and MACE (HR, 0.89; P=0.0007).
- The two-stent group had a higher prevalence of extensive coronary artery stenosis.
Conclusions:
- The single-stent technique is associated with more favorable 3-year clinical outcomes compared to the two-stent technique in patients with distal unprotected LMCA disease treated with DES.
- This suggests that a single-stent approach may be preferred for managing distal unprotected LMCA disease when feasible.
Background:
This study sought to compare 3-year outcomes of single- versus two-stent techniques in patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease treated with drug-eluting stents (DES).
Methods And Results:
A total of 392 patients with distal unprotected LMCA disease who underwent DES implantation with single- (n = 234) or two- (n = 158) stent techniques were evaluated. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). The two-stent group was more likely to have extensive coronary artery stenosis. After adjustment with weighted Cox model using the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the 3-year risk of death was similar in the single- and two-stent groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.13, P = 0.62). However, the 3-year risks of MI (HR, 0.38, 95% CI, 0.19-0.78, P = 0.008), TLR (HR, 0.16, 95% CI, 0.05-0.57, P = 0.005), and MACE (HR, 0.89, 95% CI, 0.22-0.67, P = 0.0007) were significantly lower in the single-stent group.
Conclusion:
Compared with the two-stent technique, the single-stent technique showed more favorable long-term clinical outcomes in patients with distal unprotected LMCA disease who received DES
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care