Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Methods of Medium Optimization

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...

Optimal Foraging

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Framing Effects

Framing Effects

Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effect of total body irradiation lung block parameters on lung doses using three-dimensional dosimetry.

Journal of applied clinical medical physics·2022

Same author

Ontologies in radiation oncology.

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)·2020

Same author

Characterization of a Bayesian network-based radiotherapy plan verification model.

Medical physics·2019

Same author

Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Tasks and Tools: The Many Roles of Machine Learning.

Medical physics·2019

Same author

Applying Probabilistic Decision Models to Clinical Trial Design.

AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science·2018

Same author

Decision analytic modeling for the economic analysis of proton radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Translational lung cancer research·2018

Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026

Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

When is better best? A multiobjective perspective.

Mark H Phillips¹, Clay Holdsworth

¹Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, P.O. Box 356043, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. markp@u.washington.edu

Medical Physics

|April 28, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Current radiation therapy treatment planning studies lack robust reporting standards. Improved methods are needed for comparing treatment plans to support better clinical decisions.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm

Published on: December 9, 2012

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

Radiation Oncology
Medical Physics

Background:

Treatment planning comparisons are crucial for advancing radiation therapy techniques.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) are commonly compared.
Evaluating the effectiveness of different treatment planning methods requires rigorous reporting.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify the most informative methods for reporting results of treatment planning comparisons.
To assess the adequacy of current reporting standards in radiation therapy studies.

Main Methods:

A review of seven articles from the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics published within the last year.
Analysis focused on studies comparing treatment plans for IMRT and IMAT.
Decision theoretical concepts were applied to evaluate the methods used for comparison.

Main Results:

No studies examined the correlation between different treatment planning objectives.
Statistical comparisons offered limited insights and were insufficient for robust decision analysis.
Current reporting methods do not fully support comprehensive evaluation of treatment planning strategies.

Conclusions:

There is a growing need for standardized, informative reporting in radiation therapy treatment planning studies.
Improved study design and result reporting are essential for reliable comparisons of IMRT and IMAT.
Enhanced standards will facilitate better clinical decision-making in radiation oncology.