Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
Published on: July 4, 2016
Orientation of μ-conotoxin PIIIA in a sodium channel vestibule, based on voltage dependence of its binding
J R McArthur1, G Singh, M L O'Mara
1Physiology and Biophysics, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1. french@ucalgary.ca.
Abstract:
Mutant cycle analysis has been used in previous studies to constrain possible docking orientations for various toxins. As an independent test of the bound orientation of μ-conotoxin PIIIA, a selectively targeted sodium channel pore blocker, we determined the contributions to binding voltage dependence of specific residues on the surface of the toxin. A change in the "apparent valence" (zδ) of the block, which is associated with a change of a specific toxin charge, reflects a change in the charge movement within the transmembrane electric field as the toxin binds. Toxin derivatives with charge-conserving mutations (R12K, R14K, and K17R) showed zδ values similar to those of wild type (0.61 ± 0.01, mean ± S.E.M.). Charge-changing mutations produced a range of responses. Neutralizing substitutions for Arg14 and Lys17 showed the largest reductions in zδ values, to 0.18 ± 0.06 and 0.20 ± 0.06, respectively, whereas unit charge-changing substitutions for Arg12, Ser13, and Arg20 gave intermediate values (0.24 ± 0.07, 0.33 ± 0.04, and 0.32 ± 0.05), which suggests that each of these residues contributes to the dependence of binding on the transmembrane voltage. Two mutations, R2A and G6K, yielded no significant change in zδ. These observations suggest that the toxin binds with Arg2 and Gly6 facing the extracellular solution, and Arg14 and Lys17 positioned most deeply in the pore. In this study, we used molecular dynamics to simulate toxin docking and performed Poisson-Boltzmann calculations to estimate the changes in local electrostatic potential when individual charges were substituted on the toxin's surface. Consideration of two limiting possibilities suggests that most of the charge movement associated with toxin binding reflects sodium redistribution within the narrow part of the pore.
Insights
Investigating μ-conotoxin PIIIA binding to sodium channels reveals key residue roles. Arg14 and Lys17 are crucial for voltage-dependent binding, suggesting deep pore insertion, while Arg2 and Gly6 face outward.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Neuroscience
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Mutant cycle analysis is a method to study protein-ligand interactions.
- μ-conotoxin PIIIA is a potent blocker of sodium channels.
- Understanding toxin-channel interactions is vital for drug development.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the bound orientation of μ-conotoxin PIIIA within the sodium channel pore.
- To investigate the contribution of specific toxin residues to the voltage dependence of channel block.
Main Methods:
- Site-directed mutagenesis of μ-conotoxin PIIIA residues.
- Measurement of the apparent valence (zδ) of the sodium channel block.
- Molecular dynamics simulations and Poisson-Boltzmann calculations.
Main Results:
- Charge-conserving mutations (R12K, R14K, K17R) did not alter zδ.
- Neutralizing mutations at Arg14 and Lys17 significantly reduced zδ.
- Mutations at Arg12, Ser13, and Arg20 showed intermediate effects on zδ.
- Mutations R2A and G6K had no significant impact on zδ.
Conclusions:
- Arg14 and Lys17 are positioned deep within the sodium channel pore.
- Arg2 and Gly6 likely face the extracellular side.
- Toxin binding involves significant sodium ion redistribution within the pore.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Voltage-gated Ion Channels
Generally, all voltage-gated ion channels have a 'voltage-sensing domain' that spans the lipid bilayer. The charged residues in the sensor move in response to the membrane potential changes that open the channel allowing ions movement. There are several types of...
Voltage-gated Ion Channels
Generally, all voltage-gated ion channels have a 'voltage-sensing domain' that spans the lipid bilayer. The charged residues in the sensor move in response to the membrane potential changes that open the channel allowing ions movement. There are several types of...
Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism
Non-gated Ion Channels
Compared to the gated ion channels, the non-gated channels, also known as leakage or passive channels, have no gating mechanism.
Non-gated Ion Channels
Compared to the gated ion channels, the non-gated channels, also known as leakage or passive channels, have no gating mechanism.
Mechanically-gated Ion Channels

