Predicting fragment binding poses using a combined MCSS MM-GBSA approach.
Muhammad K Haider1, Hugues-Olivier Bertrand, Roderick E Hubbard
1York Structural Biology Laboratory, University of York , Heslington, York YO10 5DD, U.K.
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
|May 3, 2011
Summary
Predicting small molecule binding poses is crucial for drug discovery. Combining docking methods like MCSS and GOLD with MM-GBSA rescoring significantly improves pose prediction accuracy, aiding chemical optimization when high-resolution structures are unavailable.
Area of Science:
- Computational chemistry
- Structural biology
- Drug discovery
Background:
- Accurate prediction of small molecule binding poses is essential for fragment-based drug discovery, especially when high-resolution structures are unobtainable.
- Fragment screening campaigns identify low molecular weight compounds that require reliable pose prediction to guide subsequent chemical modifications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of implicit solvent methods for assessing fragment binding poses generated by the Multiple Copy Simultaneous Search (MCSS) method.
- To investigate the impact of utilizing multiple receptor structures to account for receptor flexibility.
- To compare the performance of MCSS and GOLD docking programs when combined with MM-GBSA rescoring.
Main Methods:
- Fragment binding poses were generated using the Multiple Copy Simultaneous Search (MCSS) method in CHARMm.
- Poses were rescored using a Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born approach with molecular volume integration and Surface Area model (MM-GBSA).
- The docking program GOLD was also employed, followed by MM-GBSA rescoring, and its performance was compared to MCSS.
- The effect of using multiple receptor structures, exemplified by Hsp90, was assessed.
Main Results:
- The original MCSS performance of 50% accurate predictions increased to 67% when poses were rescored with MM-GBSA.
- Similar performance improvements were observed using the GOLD docking program followed by MM-GBSA rescoring.
- Combining results from both MCSS and GOLD docking methods led to a higher success rate in identifying correct binding poses.
- Using multiple receptor structures for Hsp90 showed variable performance improvements.
Conclusions:
- Implicit solvent methods, specifically MM-GBSA, significantly enhance the accuracy of fragment binding pose prediction when applied to MCSS or GOLD docking results.
- Comparing different docking methodologies can improve the identification of correct binding poses.
- These enhanced docking predictions can confidently guide chemical optimization efforts, particularly for targets with relatively rigid structures or when multiple diverse crystal structures are available.
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
Ligand Binding Sites
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:


