Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Largest single-institution series of robotic pneumonectomy.

Frontiers in surgery·2026
Same author

Control before crisis: A six-step robotic approach to pulmonary artery management.

JTCVS techniques·2026
Same author

Less pain and earlier recovery after extra-thoracic single-port robotic lung resection: a propensity-matched comparison.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

World's Largest Single-Surgeon Experience in Robotic Resection of Pulmonary and Bronchial Carcinoid Tumors.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Redefining stapling in single-port thoracic surgery: initial clinical experience.

Journal of robotic surgery·2026
Same author

Robotic tracheal resections on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with 23-hour length of stay and without guardian chin stitch.

Frontiers in surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

Starting a robotic program in general thoracic surgery: why, how, and lessons learned.

Robert J Cerfolio1, Ayesha S Bryant, Douglas J Minnich

  • 1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA. robert.cerfolio@ccc.uab.edu

The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
|May 3, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study shows robotic thoracic surgery is safe and effective for procedures like lobectomy and thymectomy. While the learning curve is steep, it offers oncological benefits and improved lymph node dissection.

More Related Videos

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
07:27

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection

Published on: February 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy
04:38

Subcostal Specimen Removal in Completely Portal Robotic Lobectomy

Published on: April 19, 2024

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
07:27

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection

Published on: February 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Robotic Surgery

Background:

  • Initiation of a robotic surgery program in general thoracic surgery.
  • Experience with a consecutive series of patients undergoing robotic procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery in thoracic procedures.
  • To identify challenges and benefits associated with establishing a robotic thoracic surgery program.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 150 patients undergoing robotic thoracic surgery between February 2009 and September 2010.
  • Analysis of procedure types, conversion rates, operative times, length of stay, and patient outcomes.

Main Results:

  • 150 patients underwent robotic operations, including lobectomy (62), thymectomy (30), and esophageal procedures (6).
  • Low conversion rates (12/150), no operative deaths, and 15% morbidity.
  • Median operative time for thymectomy was 119 minutes (1-day stay), and for lobectomy was 185 minutes (2-day stay).
  • All cancer patients achieved R0 resection with complete lymph node dissection.

Conclusions:

  • Robotic thoracic surgery is safe and oncologically sound, particularly for thymectomy and mediastinal tumors.
  • A steep learning curve exists, requiring team training and optimized instrumentation.
  • Further studies on credentialing and cost-effectiveness are necessary.