Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Interrater reliability of using brief standardized outcome measures in a community mental health setting
Dawn I Velligan1, Linda Lopez, Desirée A Castillo
1Departmentof Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. velligand@uthscsa.edu
Objective:
Given psychiatry's need to implement measurement-based care, the study examined whether direct-care staff could reliably administer brief positive and negative symptom instruments to track symptom changes and inform clinical decision making.
Methods:
Raters (82 case managers) were assessed at baseline. Training was provided for individuals not meeting reliability criteria. These individuals were reassessed to determine the effect of training. In addition, rater drift was assessed for raters judged to be reliable at baseline.
Results:
Seventy-seven percent of direct-care staff met criteria for reliability either at baseline or after they received additional training.
Conclusions:
A majority of direct-care staff can be trained to reliability on brief scales of positive and negative symptoms that can be used to guide clinical decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Self-Report Tests of Personality