Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Highly Sensitive and Quantitative Detection of Proteins and Their Isoforms by Capillary Isoelectric Focusing Method
Published on: September 19, 2018
Specificity of HCPTP variants toward EphA2 tyrosines by quantitative selected reaction monitoring
Deepa Balasubramaniam1, Lake N Paul, Kristoff T Homan
1Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
Abstract:
EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase and the human cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase (HCPTP) are overexpressed in a number of epithelial cancers. Overexpressed EphA2 in these cancers shows a significant decrease in phosphotyrosine content which results in suppression of receptor signaling and endocytosis and an increase in metastatic potential. The decreased phosphotyrosine content of EphA2 has been associated with decreased contact with its ligand, ephrin A1 and dephosphorylation by HCPTP. Potential specificity of the two HCPTP variants for tyrosines on EphA2 has not been investigated. We have used a mass spectrometry assay to measure relative rates of dephosphorylation for the two HCPTP variants at phosphotyrosine sites associated with control of the EphA2 kinase activity or interaction with downstream targets. Our results suggest that although both variants dephosphorylate the EphA2 receptor, the rate and specificity of dephosphorylation for specific tyrosines are different for HCPTP-A and HCPTP-B. The SAM domain tyrosine Y960 which has been implicated in downstream PI3K signaling is dephosphorylated exclusively by HCPTP-B. The activation loop tyrosine (Y772) which directly controls kinase activity is dephosphorylated about six times faster by HCPTP-A. In contrast, the juxtamembrane tyrosines (Y575, Y588 and Y594) which are implicated in both control of kinase activity and downstream signaling are dephosphorylated by both variants with similar rates. This difference in preference for dephosphorylation sites on EphA2 not only illuminates the different roles of the two variants of the phosphatase in EphA2 signaling, but also explains why both HCPTP variants are highly conserved in most mammals.
Insights
Human cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase (HCPTP) variants A and B show distinct dephosphorylation activities on the EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase. This specificity influences cancer signaling pathways and explains HCPTP conservation.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Research
- Biochemistry
Background:
- EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase and human cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase (HCPTP) are overexpressed in epithelial cancers.
- Overexpressed EphA2 exhibits decreased phosphotyrosine content, suppressing signaling and promoting metastasis.
- HCPTP dephosphorylation is linked to reduced EphA2 phosphotyrosine levels and impaired receptor function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specificity of two HCPTP variants (HCPTP-A and HCPTP-B) in dephosphorylating specific tyrosine residues on the EphA2 receptor.
- To elucidate the distinct roles of HCPTP variants in regulating EphA2 signaling pathways.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a mass spectrometry assay to quantify the relative dephosphorylation rates of EphA2 phosphotyrosine sites by HCPTP-A and HCPTP-B.
- Focused on phosphotyrosine sites critical for EphA2 kinase activity and downstream signaling interactions.
Main Results:
- Both HCPTP-A and HCPTP-B dephosphorylate EphA2, but with differing rates and specificities for distinct tyrosine residues.
- HCPTP-B exclusively dephosphorylates Y960 (SAM domain), crucial for PI3K signaling.
- HCPTP-A dephosphorylates the activation loop tyrosine Y772 (kinase activity control) approximately six times faster than HCPTP-B; juxtamembrane tyrosines (Y575, Y588, Y594) are dephosphorylated similarly by both variants.
Conclusions:
- The differential dephosphorylation activity of HCPTP-A and HCPTP-B on specific EphA2 tyrosines highlights their distinct roles in regulating EphA2 signaling.
- These findings provide insight into the functional divergence of HCPTP variants and explain their conserved presence across mammalian species.
More Related Videos
09:40A Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Approach for Global and High-Confidence Protein R-Methylation Analysis
Published on: April 28, 2022
05:52Histone Modification Screening using Liquid Chromatography, Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry, and Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Published on: January 12, 2024