Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026
07:45
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
Evolution in hip resurfacing design and contemporary experience with an uncemented device
1Department of Orthopaedics, Weston General Hospital, Grange Road, Uphill, Weston-super-Mare BS23 4TQ, United Kingdom. robertspencer@nhs.net
Summary
Hip resurfacing offers successful outcomes, particularly for active males, with cementless implants gaining popularity. Careful patient selection and precise implant placement are crucial to avoid complications like adverse reactions to metal debris.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomaterials science
Background:
- Hip resurfacing and metal-on-metal articulations have historical roots dating back to the 1930s.
- Recent advancements have led to more successful hip resurfacing implant designs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the outcomes and indications of modern hip resurfacing procedures.
- To highlight the importance of implant selection and surgical technique.
Main Methods:
- Review of experience with the Cormet hip resurfacing device.
- Analysis of both hybrid (cementless cup, cemented head) and entirely cementless implants.
- Evaluation of various surgical approaches.
Main Results:
- Both hybrid and cementless hip resurfacing implants have shown good results.
- Cementless options are increasing in popularity.
- Hip resurfacing is most suitable for young to middle-aged, active males.
Conclusions:
- Hip resurfacing can be a bone- and soft-tissue-conserving option, even in revision surgery.
- Careful patient selection is vital, especially for smaller individuals, females, and those with hip dysplasia, to prevent adverse reactions to metal debris.
- Accurate implant placement is critical for successful hip resurfacing outcomes.