[Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a standard diagnostic criterium for diabetes?]
Marta Ewa Bryśkiewicz1, Lilianna Majkowska
1Klinika Diabetologii i Chorób Wewnetrznych, Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Szczecin, Polska. pechmar@poczta.onet.pl
Insights
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is crucial for diabetes monitoring and diagnosis. However, method standardization is vital due to discrepancies impacting diabetes diagnosis rates.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Endocrinology
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is the gold standard for diabetes management and risk assessment.
- Major studies like DCCT and UKPDS established HbA1c as an independent predictor of diabetic vascular complications.
- The American Diabetes Association recommended HbA1c for diabetes diagnosis in 2010 due to its accuracy and stability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the importance of HbA1c in diabetes assessment.
- To discuss the challenges and necessity of standardizing HbA1c measurement methods.
- To address discrepancies between HbA1c and glucose-based diagnoses.
Main Methods:
- Review of HbA1c analytical methods including HPLC, affinity chromatography, electrophoresis, and immunoassays.
- Comparison of HbA1c results obtained from different laboratory methods.
- Analysis of discrepancies in carbohydrate disorder diagnosis based on HbA1c versus glucose levels.
Main Results:
- HbA1c is widely used for routine diabetes monitoring and diagnosis.
- Significant variations exist in HbA1c results depending on the analytical method employed.
- Standardization of HbA1c methods is crucial for consistent and reliable clinical interpretation.
- Discrepancies between HbA1c and glucose-based diagnoses raise concerns about widespread HbA1c adoption.
Conclusions:
- Standardization of HbA1c measurement methods is essential for accurate diabetes diagnosis and management.
- Addressing analytical variability is critical to ensure reliable risk assessment and treatment monitoring.
- Further investigation is needed to reconcile diagnostic differences between HbA1c and glucose-based criteria.
Abstract:
Glycated hemoglobin HbA1c is considered the gold standard for assessing the compensation and treatment of diabetes. After the success of the DCCT and UKPDS studies, which showed that HbA1c is an independent indicator of risk for the development of chronic vascular complications of diabetes, this parameter was used for routine monitoring of metabolic control. In 2010, the American Diabetes Association introduced HbA1c determined by HPLC or HPLC-standardized methods for the diagnosis of diabetes as a parameter more accurate and more stable than the determination of fasting plasma glucose or oral glucose tolerance test. HbA1c measurements can be performed by different analytical methods including HPLC, affinity chromatography, electrophoresis and immunoenzymatic and immunoturbidometric methods. Due to differences in the results of HbA1c determined by laboratories using various methods, it is extremely important to standardize methods for the results given by the HPLC method compared to the methods used in the DCCT and UKPDS studies. The problem is even greater as the large discrepancies are observed between the frequency of carbohydrate disorders diagnosed on the basis of determination of HbA1c and glucose, which raise important questions concerning the widespread introduction of HbA1c for the diagnosis of diabetes.
Related Concept Videos
Type II Diabetes Mellitus III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis
Hyperglycemia
Diabetes: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and Complications
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Diabetes Mellitus: Introduction
Hypoglycemia

