Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
Speed maintenance under cognitive load - Implications for theories of driver behaviour
Ben Lewis-Evans1, Dick de Waard, Karel A Brookhuis
1Traffic and Environmental Psychology Group, Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS, The Netherlands.
Driver risk perception and effort increase only after exceeding preferred speeds, even under cognitive load. This suggests a threshold effect in motivational theories of driver behavior.
Area of Science:
- Traffic Psychology
- Driver Behavior Analysis
- Human Factors in Transportation
Background:
- Existing driver behavior theories lack widespread acceptance due to testing difficulties.
- Motivational theories of driving behavior are divided into two groups: constant monitoring of subjective variables (e.g., risk) versus variables becoming relevant only after a threshold is passed.
- Understanding these motivational thresholds is crucial for developing effective traffic safety interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether subjective driving variables like risk and effort are constantly monitored or only become relevant above a certain speed threshold.
- To examine the influence of cognitive load on driver responses to speed manipulations.
- To differentiate between two prominent classes of motivational theories in driver behavior.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a driving simulator to manipulate participant speeds (±10, 20, 30 km/h from preferred speed) and cognitive load (mental arithmetic task).
- Collected verbal ratings on task difficulty, effort, feeling of risk, and speed typicality after each speed interval.
- Repeated speed manipulations and data collection across seven different speed change conditions.
Main Results:
- A threshold effect was observed for task difficulty, effort, and feeling of risk; significant increases were noted only after speeds exceeded participants' preferred travel speeds.
- This threshold relationship persisted even when participants were under cognitive load, although the effect was diminished.
- Drivers experienced difficulty maintaining speeds below their preferred level when under cognitive load, but found exceeding preferred speeds easier to maintain in the short term.
Conclusions:
- Findings support the motivational theory that subjective variables like risk are relevant only after a certain threshold is passed, rather than being constantly monitored.
- Cognitive load impacts driver's ability to manage speed relative to their preference, making lower-than-preferred speeds more challenging.
- The study provides empirical evidence for threshold-based models of driver motivation and behavior, informing future traffic psychology research and safety strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Optimal Arousal Theory
Inverted U-Shaped Performance Curve
The...
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation
Reason and Intuition
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

