Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT01:25

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT

Calcium-Scoring CT ScanA calcium-scoring CT scan, also known as coronary artery calcium (CAC) scan, detects calcium deposits in the coronary arteries. This test assesses the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), which can lead to cardiovascular events such as angina, heart failure, and sudden cardiac arrest.A calcium-scoring CT scan is generally recommended for individuals at intermediate risk of CAD without symptoms. It includes:Men aged 40-75 and women aged 50-75: Especially those with a...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PATCH (Preferred Attachment Strategy for Optimal Electrocardiograms)-1 Study.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac SocietyĀ·2024
Same author

A clinical score to predict recovery in end-stage kidney disease due to acute kidney injury.

Clinical kidney journalĀ·2024
Same author

Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Kidney Failure.

Journal of the American Heart AssociationĀ·2024
Same author

Intimate Partner Violence and the Role of Breast Imaging Centers.

Journal of breast imagingĀ·2024
Same author

Textural Characteristics of Biopsy-proven Metastatic Axillary Nodes on Preoperative Breast MRI in Breast Cancer Patients: A Feasibility Study.

Journal of breast imagingĀ·2024
Same author

"Managing Up": Cultivating Relationships With Practice Leaders.

Journal of breast imagingĀ·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

False positive marks on unsuspicious screening mammography with computer-aided detection.

Mary C Mahoney1, Karthikeyan Meganathan

  • 1Barrett Cancer Center, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman Street, Mail Location 772, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA. mahonemc@healthall.com

Journal of Digital Imaging
|May 7, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems in mammography screening generate many false positives, but most are easily dismissed by radiologists. This study found minimal differences between two CAD systems in specificity and false positive rates.

More Related Videos

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography
05:28

Clinical Imaging of Microwave Mammography

Published on: November 14, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Background:

  • Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems are used as an aid in screening mammography.
  • A high rate of false positive detections can hinder the effectiveness of CAD systems.
  • Evaluating the performance of different CAD systems is crucial for optimizing their clinical utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To retrospectively evaluate the specificity, false positive rate, and ease of dismissing false positive marks from two CAD systems.
  • To compare the performance of two CAD systems in screening mammography.
  • To investigate the impact of breast density on CAD system performance.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 100 screening mammographic studies with normal follow-up.
  • Evaluation of two CAD systems, recording breast density, CAD marks, and radiologist's ease of dismissing false positives.
  • Calculation of specificity for all marks, mass marks, and calcification marks for each CAD system.

Main Results:

  • Specificities varied between CAD versions for all marks (23% vs. 15%), mass marks (35% vs. 17%), and calcification marks (62% vs. 75%).
  • No significant difference in the number of marks per case for all marks or mass marks.
  • A statistically significant difference was observed in calcification marks per case (p < 0.01).
  • Most false positive marks (84% and 88%) were classified as very easy/easy to dismiss.

Conclusions:

  • The two CAD systems showed minor differences in specificity and false positive marks.
  • False positive marks generated by CAD systems are generally easy for radiologists to dismiss.
  • Further research is warranted to explore statistically non-significant differences in performance between dense and non-dense breasts.