Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
ACCF/AHA/HFSA 2011 survey results: current staffing profile of heart failure programs, including programs that
Insights
This survey reveals current staffing patterns in heart failure (HF) and heart transplant programs. Developing staffing guidelines is crucial for managing growing patient volumes and ensuring quality care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Healthcare Management
- Clinical Practice
Background:
- No established staffing recommendations exist for heart failure (HF) or heart transplant clinics.
- Growing HF patient populations necessitate understanding current clinical resource allocation.
- Quality improvement initiatives and financial pressures highlight the need for efficient staffing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey and identify current staffing patterns in HF, heart transplant, and mechanical circulatory support device (MCSD) programs.
- To establish a baseline understanding of staffing levels in diverse clinical settings.
- To inform the development of future staffing guidelines.
Main Methods:
- An online survey was distributed to members of the ACCF, AHA, and HFSA interested in HF, heart transplant, or both.
- The survey was conducted between March 12, 2009, and May 12, 2009.
- Data from 257 US and 58 international practices were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Most practices (43%) had fewer than 4 staff members; only 23% were medium to large programs.
- Average annual staffing included 2.65 physician FTEs, 2.21 nonphysician practitioner FTEs, and 2.61 nurse coordinator FTEs.
- Larger programs performed more transplants and saw more outpatients, with staffing increasing proportionally.
Conclusions:
- Current staffing levels in HF and transplant programs vary significantly.
- There is a need for evidence-based staffing guidelines to ensure adequate professional coverage.
- This survey provides initial data to support the development of such essential standards.
Objectives:
There have been no published recommendations about staffing needs for a heart failure (HF) clinic or an office setting focused on heart transplant. The goal of this survey was to understand the current staffing environment of HF, transplant, and mechanical circulatory support device (MCSD) programs in the United States and abroad. This report identifies current staffing patterns but does not endorse a particular staffing model.
Methods:
An online survey, jointly sponsored by the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), American Heart Association (AHA), and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), was sent to the members of all 3 organizations who had identified themselves as interested in HF, heart transplant, or both, between March 12, 2009, and May 12, 2009.
Results:
The overall response rate to the 1,823 e-mail surveys was 23%. There were 257 unique practices in the United States (81% of total sites) and 58 international sites (19%); approximately 30% of centers were in a cardiovascular group practice and 30% in a medical school hospital setting. The large majority of practices delivered HF care in both an inpatient and outpatient environment, and slightly more centers were implanting MCSDs (47%) than performing cardiac transplantation (39%). Most practices (43%) were small, with <4 staff members, or small- to medium-sized (34%), with 4 to 10 staff members, with only 23% being medium (11-20 staff) or large programs (>20 staff). On average, a U.S. HF practice cared for 1,641 outpatients annually. An average HF program with transplant performed 10 transplants. Although larger programs were able to perform more transplants and see more outpatient HF visits, their clinician staffing volume tended to double for approximately every 500 to 700 additional HF visits annually. The average staffing utilization was 2.65 physician full-time equivalents (FTEs), 2.21 nonphysician practitioner (nurse practitioner or physician assistant) FTEs, and 2.61 nurse coordinator FTEs annually.
Conclusions:
The HF patient population is growing in number in the United States and internationally, and the clinicians who provide the highly skilled and time-consuming care to this population are under intense scrutiny as a result of focused quality improvement initiatives and reduced financial resources. Staffing guidelines should be developed to ensure that an adequate number of qualified professionals are hired for a given practice volume. These survey results are an initial step in developing such standards.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

