Endovascular repair of complicated chronic distal aortic dissections: intermediate outcomes and complications

Woong Chol Kang1, Roy K Greenberg, Tara M Mastracci

  • 1Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

Insights

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) offers a viable option for complicated chronic distal aortic dissection (CDAD), demonstrating reduced aortic diameter and acceptable survival rates. However, long-term complications and reinterventions highlight the need for continued patient monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Vascular Medicine
  • Interventional Radiology

Background:

  • Chronic distal aortic dissection (CDAD) poses significant risks for patients, with undefined optimal management strategies.
  • Open surgery for CDAD involves high morbidity, and data on thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the intermediate-term outcomes of TEVAR in patients with complicated CDAD.
  • To assess TEVAR's effectiveness in managing aortic growth, malperfusion, and pain in CDAD patients.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 76 consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR for complicated CDAD between 2000 and 2007.
  • Analysis of demographic data, indications, complications, and aortic morphology using 3D imaging.
  • Kaplan-Meier survival and reintervention-free survival analysis.

Main Results:

  • Early mortality was 5%, with no cases of paraplegia.
  • At a mean follow-up of 34 months, survival was 80% at 36 months, with 22% requiring secondary reinterventions.
  • TEVAR reduced aortic diameter in the stented segment but not in untreated areas; complete false lumen thrombosis was infrequent in extensive dissections.

Conclusions:

  • TEVAR is a reasonable treatment for thoracic aortic dissections and can prevent focal aortic growth in extensive dissections.
  • The complexity of CDAD necessitates long-term follow-up due to potential late complications and secondary interventions.
Abstract