Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

A primer for nonresponse in the US forest inventory and analysis program.

Paul L Patterson1, John W Coulston, Francis A Roesch

  • 1U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2150A Centre Ave, Suite 350, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA. plpatterson@fs.fed.us

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
|May 10, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Nonresponse in forest inventory data, particularly from denied access on private lands, can bias estimates. Strategies to mitigate this bias include improved stratification and alternative estimation techniques, avoiding plot replacement.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methods for estimating status and change in presence and foliar cover area of invasive plants using national forest inventory data.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same author

Model error propagation in a compatible tree volume, biomass, and carbon prediction system.

Carbon balance and management·2025
Same author

Near-term investments in forest management support long-term carbon sequestration capacity in forests of the United States.

PNAS nexus·2023
Same author

Three-phase hierarchical model-based and hybrid inference.

MethodsX·2023
Same author

A spatial and temporal assessment of nonresponse in the national forest inventory of the U.S.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2022
Same author

Using a hybrid demand-allocation algorithm to enable distributional analysis of land use change patterns.

PloS one·2020

Area of Science:

  • Forestry
  • Ecology
  • Statistical modeling

Background:

  • The USDA Forest Service's Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program quantifies US forest resources.
  • Nonresponse in data collection can introduce bias into population parameter estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Quantify nonresponse magnitude and mechanisms in FIA data.
  • Evaluate FIA's nonresponse assumptions and recommend bias mitigation strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Quantified nonresponse rates across different land ownership groups.
  • Qualitatively assessed the tenability of the 'missing at random' assumption.
  • Evaluated current and proposed plot replacement and estimation strategies.

Main Results:

More Related Videos

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods
08:20

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods
08:20

A Method for Quantifying Foliage-Dwelling Arthropods

Published on: October 20, 2019

  • Nonresponse rates varied from 0% to 21%, with denied access on private land being the primary cause.
  • The 'missing at random' assumption was found tenable in most cases but not universally.
  • Plot replacement was identified as a strategy to avoid.

Conclusions:

  • Implement stratification schemes to ensure data are missing at random.
  • Explore alternative estimation techniques using weighting and auxiliary data.
  • Refrain from replacing nonresponse sample locations to prevent bias.