Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Situational and dispositional determinants of intentional deceiving
Maria Serena Panasiti1, Enea Francesco Pavone, Arcangelo Merla
1Psychology Department, Sapienza-University of Rome, Rome, Italy. mariaserena.panasiti@uniroma1.it
Abstract:
Does opportunity make the thief or are people dispositionally prone to deceive? The interaction between personality and the circumstances surrounding deception is crucial to understand what promotes dishonesty in our society. Due to its inherent spontaneity and sociality, deceptive behaviour may be hardly reproducible in experimental settings. We developed a novel paradigm in the form of an interactive game where participants can choose whether to lie to another person in situations of loss vs. gain, and of no-reputation-risk vs. reputation-risk linked to the disclosure of their deceptive behaviour to others. Thus, our ecological paradigm allowed subjects to spontaneously decide when to lie and face the challenge of deceiving others. In the case of loss, participants lied to reverse the outcome in their favour. Deception was lower in the reputation-risk condition where personality traits concerning social interactions also played an important role. The results suggest that deception is definitely promoted by unfavourable events, and that maintaining one's own reputation encourages honesty, particularly in socially inclined individuals.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Fundamental Attribution Error
Attribution Theory
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Deindividuation
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation

