[Metastatic renal cell cancer in Germany in 2010. Impact of different target therapies]

Since 2006 in Germany six different target drugs for therapy in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) have been used. Comparative studies for the application with the same indication are absent, and the order of potential sequential therapy is up to now unclear. The aim of the study was to collect data on therapy decisions in Germany regarding mRCC in the age of "targeted therapy". At the same time the study addressed the central question of sequencing of the different therapy options. In addition, the data of this study were to be compared to a study already published in 2008.

In 2010, four groups of doctors specialized in the therapy of patients with mRCC were asked for their behaviour in the first-, second- and third-line or sequential therapy. Those questioned included urologists in private practice (n=40), oncologists in private practice (n=40), hospital urologists (n=35) and hospital oncologists (n=35). Further the reasons for a therapy decision should be stated or weighted.

Altogether 92% of all patients with mRCC were treated. Urologists in private practice treat only 30% of their patients themselves. The earlier used immune therapies (IFN, IL-2) no longer play a role. Sunitinib is used most often in first-line therapy by urologists in private practice (50.4%) and oncologists in private practice (47.1%). In second- and third-line therapy everolimus is used by urologists in private practice (27.1%, 26.3%) and sorafenib (28.6%) or everolimus (26.4%) by oncologists in private practice. Hospital oncologists use primarily sunitinib (56.1%), in second-line sorafenib (45.5%) and in third-line above all everolimus (19.4%). Hospital urologists use sunitinib most often for first-line therapy (57.6%) and sorafenib for second-line treatment (37.3%), while in third-line therapy temsirolimus (49.6%) and also everolimus (30.4%) were used.

The therapy of mRCC is determined very strongly by the substances sunitinib and sorafenib. The mTOR inhibitors have recently been increasingly included in the second- and third-line therapy. With the introduction of the new targeted therapies, the treatment of these special patients is performed less by urologists and increasingly more by oncologists. This trend is strengthened in comparison to the DGFIT study from 2008.