Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Aetiology of global developmental delay in young children: experience from a tertiary care centre in India
Anurag Tikaria1, Madhulika Kabra, Neerja Gupta
1Department of Paediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India.
Insights
A comprehensive diagnostic work-up identified the cause of global developmental delay in 73% of young children. A step-wise approach is recommended for all children, even without clear examination findings, to determine the aetiology of developmental delay.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Neurology
- Genetics
Background:
- Global developmental delay is a frequent reason for pediatric referral.
- Identifying the cause is crucial for appropriate management and intervention.
- Tertiary referral centers manage complex cases requiring extensive diagnostic evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the etiological yield of a comprehensive diagnostic work-up in young children with global developmental delay.
- To identify predictors of etiology based on initial clinical presentation.
- To propose an optimized investigative strategy for diagnosing global developmental delay.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of 100 consecutive children under 5 years with global developmental delay.
- Analysis of clinical features, medical history, and results of diagnostic investigations.
- Statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test and chi-square test to identify significant predictors of etiology.
Main Results:
- The etiological yield of the diagnostic work-up was 73%.
- Chromosomal disorders, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, malformation syndromes, and cerebral dysgenesis were the most common causes.
- Clinical predictors of etiology included birth asphyxia, sepsis, seizures, abnormal neurological findings, and dysmorphism.
- Neuroimaging for specific indications was more effective than screening neuroimaging (65% vs. 35%).
Conclusions:
- A 73% etiological yield was achieved in this cohort of children with global developmental delay.
- A step-wise diagnostic approach is recommended for all children with developmental delay, irrespective of severity or initial findings.
- The findings support the development of targeted investigative strategies, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Background:
Global developmental delay is a common reason for referral to a paediatrician. We examined the aetiological yield of an extensive diagnostic work-up in young children with developmental delay in a tertiary referral centre.
Methods:
To assess the diagnostic possibilities, we systematically examined 100 consecutive children with global developmental delay (< 5 years of age) who visited the paediatric outpatient department over a period of 18 months. An association between the presence of features at initial contact and aetiology was analysed by the 2-tailed Fisher exact test and chi-square test.
Results:
Of the 100 children, 65 were < 2 years of age (mean age 23.6 months) at presentation. The presence of birth asphyxia, sepsis, seizures, abnormal neurological findings, and dysmorphism were significant predictors of aetiology. Four diagnostic categories--chromosomal disorders including Down syndrome, hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, multiple malformation syndromes and cerebral dysgenesis--were the most common causes of global development delay in 20%, 15%, 14% and 11%, respectively. Moderate delay was seen in 42%, severe in 33% and mild in 25% of the patients. The aetiological yield did not differ with the severity of global developmental delay. Additional investigations such as neuroimaging, cytogenetic analysis, metabolic tests and specific molecular tests contributed to a diagnosis in 73% of the children, while in 23% these were the sole means of arriving at a diagnosis. Neuroimaging for a specific indication was almost twice more likely to yield an aetiology when compared with neuroimaging performed as a screening tool (65% v. 35%; p = 0.003).
Conclusion:
The aetiological yield in this selected cohort with global developmental delay was 73%. A step-wise investigational approach is justified in all children with developmental delay, regardless of the severity of delay or the absence of findings on history and physical examination. This study is an attempt to formulate an investigative approach in a child with global developmental delay, especially in developing countries where advanced molecular and cytogenetic studies are not routinely available.
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings.
Intellectual Disability
Nature and Nurture
Introduction to Developmental Psychology
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
