Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice
06:37

Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice

Published on: September 13, 2024

Arthroscopy for temporomandibular disorders.

Marcelo Rigon1, Ligia M Pereira, Marcelo C Bortoluzzi

  • 1Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Rua Espirito Santo, 536, Londrina, Brazil, 86010 510.

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|May 13, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cervical critical dentin in non-carious cervical lesions: relationship with remaining dentin thickness and implications for restorative decision-making.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

6-Month Clinical Evaluation of Reduced Dentin Etching Time Using Universal Adhesives in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]·2026
Same author

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders·2026
Same author

Material fracture/retention rates of occluso-proximal composite resin restorations with polyethylene fibers in primary molars: an interim randomized controlled trial.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Time to color stabilization during in-office bleaching with 35% hydrogen peroxide: A prospective clinical study.

Journal of dentistry·2026
Same author

Effects of Overnight Whitening Pens on Hydrogen Peroxide Penetration, Color Change, and Enamel Surface Properties.

Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.]·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Arthroscopy and nonsurgical treatments for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) both reduced pain at 6 months. Open surgery was more effective than arthroscopy for pain relief at 12 months, but arthroscopy improved jaw opening more than arthrocentesis.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Orthodontics
  • Pain Management

Background:

  • Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) encompass a range of conditions affecting the jaw joint and masticatory muscles, influenced by organic, psychological, and psychosocial factors.
  • Signs of TMDs are prevalent, with 40%-75% of the population exhibiting symptoms, and 33% reporting discomfort.
  • Arthroscopy is a surgical procedure used for TMD management, but its overall effectiveness requires further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopy in managing the signs and symptoms associated with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, AMED, and CINAHL, up to December 2010.

More Related Videos

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
06:16

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy

Published on: May 1, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice
06:37

Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice

Published on: September 13, 2024

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy
06:16

A Probing Device for Quantitatively Measuring the Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissues during Arthroscopy

Published on: May 1, 2020

  • Included studies were randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) investigating arthroscopy for TMD treatment, with no language or publication date restrictions.
  • Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers, with efforts to obtain additional information from study authors.
  • Main Results:

    • Seven RCTs involving 349 patients were analyzed, all exhibiting high or unclear risk of bias.
    • Arthroscopy showed no statistically significant difference in pain reduction compared to nonsurgical treatments at 6 months (SMD = 0.004; P = 0.81) or compared to arthrocentesis at 12 months (MD = 0.10; P = 0.90).
    • Open surgery demonstrated a statistically significant advantage over arthroscopy in pain reduction at 12 months (SMD = 0.45; P = 0.05), while arthroscopy resulted in significantly greater improvement in maximum interincisal opening compared to arthrocentesis (MD = 5.28; P < 0.0001).

    Conclusions:

    • Both arthroscopy and nonsurgical interventions effectively alleviate pain at 6 months post-treatment.
    • Open surgery offers superior pain relief compared to arthroscopy at the 12-month follow-up.
    • While arthroscopy enhances maximum interincisal opening more than arthrocentesis, no significant differences were observed in mandibular functionality or other clinical outcomes between the compared procedures.