Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Overview01:20

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Overview

Atomic emission spectroscopy (AES) is an analytical technique used to determine the elemental composition of a sample by analyzing the light emitted from excited atoms. In AES, atoms in a sample are excited to higher energy levels by thermal energy from high-temperature sources, such as plasma, arcs, or sparks. When these excited atoms return to lower energy states, they emit light at specific wavelengths characteristic of each element. The resulting atomic emission spectrum, which consists of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large elements and advanced beamformers for increased field of view in 2-D ultrasound matrix arrays.

Ultrasonics·2026
Same author

Increasing ultrasound field-of-view with reduced element count arrays containing large elements.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Assessing the benefits of using plane wave compounding when estimating backscatter coefficients with an in situ bead as a calibration target.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Recent advances in transducers for through-tissue ultrasonic power transfer.

Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)·2026
Same author

Increasing ultrasound field-of-view with reduced element count arrays containing large elements.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Large elements and advanced beamformers for increased field of view in 2-D ultrasound matrix arrays.

ArXiv·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

On the estimation of backscatter coefficients using single-element focused transducers.

Roberto J Lavarello1, Goutam Ghoshal, Michael L Oelze

  • 1Bioacoustics Research Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 North Matthews, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA. lavarell@illinois.edu

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|May 17, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) backscatter coefficient (BSC) estimation methods show consistency, but calibration impacts results. Careful method selection is crucial for accurate, system-independent structural information.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle
15:06

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle

Published on: January 3, 2016

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
12:24

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Published on: July 17, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
08:08

Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System

Published on: March 6, 2019

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle
15:06

Measurement of Scattering Nonlinearities from a Single Plasmonic Nanoparticle

Published on: January 3, 2016

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
12:24

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers

Published on: July 17, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Acoustics
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging aims for system-independent structural analysis using backscatter coefficient (BSC) estimation.
  • Accurate BSC estimation is vital for reliable QUS-based material characterization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare and evaluate the consistency of three different BSC estimation methods.
  • To assess the impact of calibration techniques on QUS estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Three BSC estimation methods were applied to identical backscattered pressure datasets from phantoms with embedded glass spheres.
  • BSC estimates were compared against theoretical values derived from optical microscopy size distributions.
  • Effective scatterer diameter and concentration were derived from BSC estimates.

Main Results:

  • One method required significant amplitude compensation to align with others.
  • Calibration methods introduced frequency-dependent effects influencing QUS estimate bias.
  • Despite variations, experimental QUS estimates typically differed by less than 10% across methods.

Conclusions:

  • While BSC estimation methods show general consistency, calibration procedures introduce variability.
  • Transducer properties and frequency range significantly influence QUS estimate accuracy.
  • Further research is needed to refine calibration for robust, system-independent QUS structural analysis.