Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
Published on: July 16, 2015
Disrupting within-channel cues to comodulation masking release.
Simon A Goldman1, Thomas Baer, Brian C J Moore
1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England. sag47@cam.ac.uk
Comodulation masking release (CMR) relies on both across- and within-channel auditory cues. Disrupting within-channel cues via on-frequency band (OFB) reversal significantly reduced CMR, demonstrating their importance.
Area of Science:
- Auditory perception
- Psychoacoustics
- Signal processing in hearing
Background:
- Comodulation masking release (CMR) is influenced by flanking bands (FBs) near the signal frequency.
- Both across-channel and within-channel auditory cues contribute to CMR.
- Within-channel cues may involve envelope beats within auditory filters.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of within-channel cues in CMR.
- To examine the effect of disrupting envelope beats using an on-frequency band (OFB) reversal technique.
- To determine if OFB reversal impacts CMR when FBs are proximal to the signal.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an on-frequency band (OFB) reversal method to disrupt envelope beats within the auditory filter centered at the signal frequency.
- Assessed CMR using a flanking-band (FB) paradigm with proximal and distal FB pairs.
- Compared CMR with OFB reversal to conditions with single FBs, distal FB pairs, and FBs in the opposite ear.
Main Results:
- OFB reversal consistently reduced CMR for proximal FB pairs.
- CMR was not reduced for single FBs, distal FB pairs, or when FBs were presented to the opposite ear.
- Simulations indicated OFB reversal diminished within-channel cues from temporal fine structure and envelope statistics.
Conclusions:
- Within-channel cues, specifically those based on envelope beats, play a crucial role in comodulation masking release (CMR).
- The OFB reversal method effectively isolates and disrupts these within-channel contributions.
- Findings highlight the interplay between across-channel and within-channel processes in auditory masking release.
Related Concept Videos
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...
Sound Waves: Interference
Feedback Inhibition
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this barrier...
Non-Verbal Cues
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...

