Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...

Confidence Coefficient

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Long COVID symptoms before and 3-35 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection in a Norwegian prospective cohort study, symptoms over the pandemic, and different virus variants.

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases·2026

Same author

Individually tailored monitoring at home after hospitalization for HEART failure (IT-HEART): design and baseline characteristics of a randomized clinical trial.

Heart failure reviews·2026

Same author

Beta-blockers, depression, and anxiety after myocardial infarction: the BETAMI-DANBLOCK trial.

European heart journal·2026

Same author

Deaths potentially averted by small changes in physical activity and sedentary time: an individual participant data meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.

Lancet (London, England)·2026

Same author

Author Reply.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2025

Same author

Editor's Choice - Norwegian Randomised Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Aortobifemoral Bypass: The Norwegian Laparoscopic Aortic Surgery Trial (NLAST).

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Calculating unreported confidence intervals for paired data.

Karim F Hirji¹, Morten W Fagerland

¹Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

|May 17, 2011

Summary

Researchers developed simple methods to calculate missing confidence intervals for paired studies using p-values. This aids in interpreting health study findings and conducting meta-analyses.

More Related Videos

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Published on: February 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Published on: February 3, 2013

Area of Science:

Biostatistics
Health Research Methodology

Background:

Confidence intervals and standard errors are crucial for assessing health study findings and meta-analyses.
These crucial statistical measures are frequently omitted in paired design studies.
Standard error computation for paired designs is challenging without additional data.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop methods for computing confidence intervals and standard errors for paired study designs.
To enable accurate interpretation and meta-analysis of studies where these statistics are unreported.

Main Methods:

Utilized fundamental relationships between standard errors and p-values.
Developed computation schemes for paired mean difference, risk difference, risk ratio, and odds ratio.

Main Results:

Accurate computation of unreported confidence intervals for large-sample paired data is achievable using p-values.
Reconstruction of the 2x2 table for paired binary data is possible with these methods.

Conclusions:

The developed methods enhance the interpretation of paired design studies.
Facilitates the inclusion of paired study data in meta-analyses.