Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

Understanding Species and Reproductive Barriers

Understanding Species and Reproductive Barriers

A species is a group of organisms that interbreed and produce fertile offspring. Typically, individuals of the same species appear similar and share common characteristics due to their highly similar genomes. However, not all organisms that look alike are members of the same species. Various mechanisms keep most species discrete. While some mechanisms prevent reproductive behavior and fertilization (pre-zygotic isolation), others prevent the production of fertile offspring after mating has...

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.For one, natural selection can only act upon existing genetic variation. Hypothetically, redtusks may enhance elephant survival by deterring ivory-seeking poachers. However, if there are no gene variants—or alleles—for redtusks, natural selection cannot increase the prevalence of...

What is Evolutionary History?

What is Evolutionary History?

Scientists record evolutionary history by analyzing fossil, morphological, and genetic data. The fossil record documents the history of life on Earth and provides evidence for evolution. However, both fossil and living organisms offer evidence that outlines Earth’s evolutionary history.Phylogenetic trees illustrate the evolutionary relationships among these organisms. Scientists infer organisms’ common ancestry by evaluating shared morphological and genetic characteristics. Together, the fossil...

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the human psyche...

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.The collection of fossils within sedimentary rocks give a record of common ancestry and often depicts the history of evolution.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Conformity to popular, not average, opinions: Models, data, and evolution.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Erratum: Impediments to countering racist pseudoscience - CORRIGENDUM.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025

Same author

Impediments to countering racist pseudoscience.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025

Same author

Gene-culture association and coevolution.

Theoretical population biology·2025

Same author

Not by Selection Alone: Expanding the Scope of Gene-Culture Coevolution.

Evolutionary anthropology·2025

Same author

Conformity to continuous and discrete ordered traits.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025

Same journal

Non-causal Explanations in the Humanities: Some Examples.

Foundations of science·2025

Same journal

Epistemic Functions of Replicability in Experimental Sciences: Defending the Orthodox View.

Foundations of science·2024

Same journal

Grounding the Selectionist Explanation for the Success of Science in the External Physical World.

Foundations of science·2024

Same journal

The Biological Production of Spacetime: A Sketch of the E-series Universe.

Foundations of science·2023

Same journal

Phenomenology and Digital Knowledge: Introduction to the Special Issue.

Foundations of science·2023

Same journal

Entangled Assemblages: The Mutual Becoming of Food and More-than-Human Being.

Foundations of science·2022

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Conceptual Barriers to Progress Within Evolutionary Biology.

Kevin N Laland¹, John Odling-Smee, Marcus W Feldman

¹School of Biology, University of St Andrews, Bute Building, Queens Terrace, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9TS, U.K. Tel. +44 1334 463568. Fax. +44 1334 463600. knl1@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Foundations of Science

|September 28, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Neo-Darwinism faces conceptual barriers due to its metaphysical foundations. Incorporating niche construction as a cause and product of evolution resolves these issues and broadens evolutionary theory.

More Related Videos

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Leveraging CyVerse Resources for De Novo Comparative Transcriptomics of Underserved (Non-model) Organisms

Published on: May 9, 2017

Area of Science:

Evolutionary Biology
Ecology
Developmental Biology

Background:

Neo-Darwinism, despite its success, has conceptual limitations rooted in its metaphysical foundations.
A key limitation is the failure to recognize niche construction as a fundamental driver of evolutionary change.
This oversight hinders the integration of evolutionary biology with other scientific disciplines.

Purpose of the Study:

To address the conceptual barriers in Neo-Darwinism.
To highlight the significance of niche construction in evolutionary theory.
To promote the integration of evolutionary biology with ecosystem ecology, developmental biology, and human sciences.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of Neo-Darwinism.
Integration of niche construction theory into evolutionary frameworks.
Examination of interdisciplinary implications for ecology, developmental biology, and human sciences.

Main Results:

Neo-Darwinism's metaphysical foundations create barriers to progress.
Niche construction is identified as a crucial, yet overlooked, cause of evolutionary change.
Excluding niche construction limits the generality and accuracy of evolutionary theory.
Disciplinary boundaries in ecology, developmental biology, and human sciences persist due to this exclusion.

Conclusions:

Incorporating niche construction as both a cause and product of evolution overcomes existing disciplinary boundaries.
This integration significantly enhances the explanatory power of evolutionary theory.
A more unified and comprehensive understanding of evolution is achieved by including niche construction.