Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

12:09
Studying Food Reward and Motivation in Humans
Published on: March 19, 2014
Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis
Daniel Balliet1, Laetitia B Mulder, Paul A M Van Lange
1School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University. dp.balliet@psy.vu.nl
Psychological Bulletin
|May 18, 2011
Summary
Rewards and punishments effectively promote cooperation in social dilemmas. Their impact is amplified when incentives are costly and punishments are used in ongoing group interactions, according to a meta-analysis.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
- Game Theory
Background:
- Social dilemmas involve conflicts between self-interest and collective well-being.
- Rewards and punishments are proposed incentives for cooperation, but their effectiveness and moderators are debated.
- Existing research lacks a comprehensive theoretical and quantitative review of these incentives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of rewards and punishments in promoting cooperation in social dilemmas.
- To identify variables that moderate the impact of these incentives.
- To propose a novel interdependence-theoretic framework for understanding incentives in social dilemmas.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of 187 effect sizes was conducted.
- The study utilized a novel interdependence-theoretic framework.
- Potential moderators such as incentive cost, source, and dilemma structure were examined.
Main Results:
- Both rewards and punishments positively impacted cooperation (d = 0.51 and 0.70, respectively), with statistically equivalent effects.
- Incentive effectiveness increased when they were costly to administer.
- Punishments were more effective in iterated dilemmas with consistent group membership.
Conclusions:
- Rewards and punishments are significant tools for fostering cooperation in social dilemmas.
- The cost of incentives and the structure of interaction (e.g., iterated vs. one-shot) significantly influence their effectiveness.
- Findings have implications for theoretical development and future research on social behavior and cooperation.
Related Concept Videos
Operant Conditioning
Operant conditioning, a key concept in behavioral psychology, involves using reinforcement and punishment to alter the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. B.F. introduced this type of conditioning. Skinner focused on voluntary behaviors and the consequences that follow them, influencing whether these behaviors will be strengthened or diminished.
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Primary and Secondary Reinforcers
In psychology, reinforcement is a key concept in behavior modification. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments involving rats in what is known as a Skinner box. The rats learned to press a lever to receive food, a primary reinforcer that fulfilled their innate need for nourishment.
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
Effective reinforcers for humans vary depending on the individual and the context. Primary reinforcers, such as food, water, sleep, shelter, and pleasure, have inherent value and satisfy basic biological...
Reinforcement
Positive and negative reinforcement are key concepts in operant conditioning, a learning process where the consequences of a behavior affect the likelihood of that behavior being repeated.
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Punishment
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Law of Effect
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

