Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Interval Level of Measurement00:55

Interval Level of Measurement

For effective statistical analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using the interval scale are similar to ordinal level data because they have a definite arrangement. However, in the interval level of measurement, the differences between data values are meaningful even though the data does not have a starting point.
Temperature is measured using the interval scale. It is measurable data, and the difference between the...
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance01:20

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects or...
Ratio Level of Measurement00:54

Ratio Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated. For...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation01:18

Microsoft Excel: Pearson's Correlation

Microsoft Excel is a powerful tool for statistical analysis, including calculating Pearson's correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two continuous variables. Pearson's correlation coefficient, often denoted as "r," ranges from -1 to 1. A value close to 1 indicates a strong positive correlation, meaning as one variable increases, the other does too. A value close to -1 indicates a strong negative correlation, implying that as one...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing bipolarity.

Psychological methods·2024
Same author

Distorted correlations among censored data: causes, effects, and correction.

Behavior research methods·2023
Same author

Initial examination of the mental health disorders: screening instrument for athletes.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Two and five-factor models of negative symptoms in schizophrenia are differentially associated with trait affect, defeatist performance beliefs, and psychosocial functioning.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2023
Same author

Latent structure of cognitive tests is invariant in men and women with schizophrenia.

Schizophrenia research·2022
Same author

Confirmatory factor analysis of imPACT cognitive tests in high school athletes.

Psychological assessment·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Examining the reliability of interval level data using root mean square differences and concordance correlation

Kimberly A Barchard1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway, P.O. Box 455030, Las Vegas, NV 89154-5030, USA. barchard@unlv.nevada.edu

Psychological Methods
|May 18, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces new statistics, the root mean square difference (RMSD) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), for evaluating score consistency beyond simple linear relationships. These methods offer a more stringent assessment of agreement between measurements.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
09:18

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting

Published on: December 15, 2023

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Measurement science
  • Statistical analysis
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Traditional correlation coefficients (e.g., Pearson's r) assess linear relationships but ignore score means and standard deviations.
  • Many scientific fields require stricter agreement criteria, focusing on the identical equality of scores.
  • Existing methods may not fully capture the nuances of score consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce novel statistics for evaluating score consistency.
  • Compare new metrics with established measures like intraclass correlation coefficients and standard error of measurement.
  • Adapt these statistics for various definitions of agreement (linear, consistency, absolute).

Main Methods:

  • Calculation of the difference between paired scores for each unit of measurement.
  • Utilizing the root mean square difference (RMSD) to quantify average change between score sets.
  • Employing the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to rescale RMSD, with a maximum value of 1.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the relationship between RMSD, CCC, and other common statistical measures (ICC, product-moment correlation, SEM).
  • Showcased the adaptability of RMSD and CCC for different agreement definitions.
  • Provided a more comprehensive approach to assessing score consistency.

Conclusions:

  • RMSD and CCC offer a more rigorous evaluation of score consistency compared to traditional correlation methods.
  • These new statistics are valuable for fields requiring precise agreement assessment.
  • The adaptability of RMSD and CCC enhances their utility across diverse measurement scenarios.