Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Implicit Personality Theories01:23

Implicit Personality Theories

Implicit personality theory explains how individuals make assumptions about the relationships between personality traits, behaviors, and character types. When people learn that someone possesses a particular trait, they tend to infer the presence of other related characteristics, forming a cohesive impression. This cognitive shortcut plays a crucial role in social interactions and interpersonal judgments.Central Traits and Their InfluenceSolomon Asch's seminal 1946 study highlighted the power...
Personal Choice and Fate Attributions01:19

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Love as a lived experience.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Pathways to dignity, constructive and destructive: Reflections on a scientific quest.

The American psychologist·2025
Same author

Blissful ignorance: A motivated cognition perspective on information avoidance.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Fear of being single and extreme behaviors aimed at finding a romantic partner.

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

A formula for love: partner merit and appreciation beget actor significance.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Means substitutability in personal significance restoration.

Frontiers in psychology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Multifinality in implicit choice.

Woo Young Chun1, Arie W Kruglanski, David Sleeth-Keppler

  • 1Department of Psychology, Chungnam National University, Korea. wooyoung@cnu.ac.kr

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|May 18, 2011
PubMed
Summary

People's choices can serve both explicit goals and unconscious, implicit goals simultaneously. This multifinality framework shows how background motivations influence decisions even when pursuing a primary objective.

More Related Videos

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
13:20

Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance

Published on: December 5, 2025

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Human decision-making is often viewed as goal-directed.
  • However, the interplay between explicit and implicit goals in shaping choices is not fully understood.
  • The concept of multifinality suggests that a single action can serve multiple goals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether choices serving an explicit focal goal also reflect the fulfillment of implicit background goals.
  • To explore the concept of multifinality in motivated cognition.
  • To determine how explicit and implicit goals interact to influence decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Five experimental studies were conducted.
  • Priming techniques were used to activate implicit goals.
  • Choice scenarios were designed to assess goal fulfillment under various conditions.
  • Control groups were employed to isolate the effects of explicit and implicit goals.

Main Results:

  • A primed implicit goal influenced choices even when individuals explicitly pursued a different focal goal.
  • This effect was observed across different types of implicit goals.
  • Implicit goals did not influence choices if they conflicted with the explicit goal.
  • The influence of a primed implicit goal diminished if the goal was already met.
  • Choices demonstrated multifinality when explicit and implicit goals were jointly present.

Conclusions:

  • The multifinality framework provides a valuable lens for understanding motivated cognition.
  • Implicit goals can significantly impact choices made in service of explicit goals.
  • Future research should explore the implications of multifinality in diverse psychological phenomena.