Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 2, 2026

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
Guideline methodology of the Society for Vascular Surgery including the experience with the GRADE framework
Mohammad Hassan Murad1, Victor M Montori, Anton N Sidawy
1Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. murad.mohammad@mayo.edu
Insights
The Society for Vascular Surgery rigorously develops clinical practice guidelines using systematic reviews and the GRADE framework. This ensures evidence-based recommendations for vascular surgery decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- The Society for Vascular Surgery initiated clinical practice guideline development in 2006.
- Guidelines aim to support clinician decision-making in vascular surgery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe the methods and rigor of guideline development procedures.
- To discuss future efforts to enhance guideline quality, adoption, and application.
Main Methods:
- Selection of high-impact clinical questions.
- Rigorous systematic reviews to evaluate evidence.
- Application of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
- Inclusion of patient values, preferences, and surgical expertise.
Main Results:
- The Society has established a robust, multidisciplinary process for guideline creation.
- Four years of experience demonstrate the systematic and rigorous nature of the adopted procedures.
Conclusions:
- The Society for Vascular Surgery employs a comprehensive methodology for developing high-quality clinical practice guidelines.
- Continuous improvement efforts are necessary to optimize the impact and implementation of these guidelines.
Abstract:
In 2006, the Society for Vascular Surgery began development of clinical practice guidelines to assist clinicians in the process of decision making. The Society selects clinical questions of high impact and evaluates the totality of evidence by identifying and conducting rigorous systematic reviews. Multidisciplinary committees follow the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework (GRADE), standard consensus, and voting procedures. Factors other than evidence, including patients' values and preferences and the availability of surgical expertise, are also considered. We describe, in the context of cumulative 4-years' experience, the methods and rigor of current procedures adopted by the Society for Vascular Surgery in developing practice guidelines. We also discuss potential future efforts needed to maximize the quality, adoption, and application of the clinical recommendations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

