Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Detection of Residual Donor Erythroid Progenitor Cells after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Hemoglobinopathies
Published on: September 6, 2017
Increased prevalence of false positive hemoglobinopathy newborn screening in premature infants
Tally Hustace1, Jay M Fleisher, Ana Milena Sanchez Varela
1Division of Pediatric Hematology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Background:
The objective was to investigate the specificity of the hemoglobinopathy newborn screening in premature neonates as compared to term neonates.
Procedure:
The screening results from infants suspected to have hemoglobinopathy disease identified by the Florida Newborn Screening Program for years 2002-2007 were compared to the corresponding confirmatory testing. The risks for false positives for preterm and full term newborns were calculated by Chi-square or the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Isoelectric focusing and HPLC were the methods of hemoglobin screening.
Results:
Over 2,300 neonates (1/576 neonates born in Florida) were suspected to have hemoglobinopathy. The most common abnormal pattern in term and preterm infants (gestational age 22-36 weeks) suggesting disease at screening was FS. Overall, 93% of the children who screened positive for FCA and 64% of infants identified with FSA were later confirmed with trait. FSC was confirmed in 96% of the cases in both preterm and term infants. Compared to term newborns, preterm newborns were more likely to have a false positive result for FS or FC at screening. Twenty-three percent of preterms with FS and 59% of preterms with FC were diagnosed as traits by confirmatory testing, compared to only 2% and 6% for term infants (P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
As compared to term newborns, more preterm newborns with trait were misidentified as having sickle cell anemia or hemoglobin C at screening. We speculate that abnormal hemoglobins may precede the development of hemoglobin A during fetal life.
Related Concept Videos
Rh Blood Group
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...