Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026
05:54
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis
M A Papadopoulos1, S N Papageorgiou, I P Zogakis
1Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece. mikepap@dent.auth.gr
Journal of Dental Research
|May 20, 2011
Summary
Miniscrew implants (MI) significantly reduce orthodontic anchorage loss compared to conventional methods. MIs demonstrate a high success rate of 87.7%, with factors like placement location and treatment duration influencing effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental Implantology
Background:
- Anchorage reinforcement is crucial in orthodontics.
- Conventional methods for anchorage can lead to undesirable tooth movement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of miniscrew implants (MI) for orthodontic anchorage.
- To assess MI success rates and identify risk factors.
Main Methods:
- A meta-analysis of literature was performed.
- Data extraction and analysis followed specific inclusion/exclusion criteria.
- Random-effects modeling was used for pooled estimates.
Main Results:
- Eight studies met the inclusion criteria.
- MIs reduced anchorage loss by a mean difference of -2.4 mm (p=0).
- Success rate for MIs was 87.7%.
Conclusions:
- Miniscrew implants are effective in decreasing or eliminating anchorage loss.
- Factors such as mandibular placement, specific insertion sites, and longer treatment duration may reduce anchorage loss.
- While generally successful, study limitations necessitate cautious interpretation of results.
