A randomized cross-over study to compare raltegravir and efavirenz (SWITCH-ER study)
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
Alain Nguyen1, Alexandra Calmy, Cecile Delhumeau
1University Clinic of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland. nguyena0@gmail.com
Background:
Efavirenz (EFV) causes neuropsychiatric side-effects and an unfavorable blood lipid profile. We investigated the effect of replacing EFV with raltegravir (RAL) on patient preference, daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, anxiety, and lipid levels.
Method:
Switch-ER was a randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Patients who tolerated EFV, with less than 50 copies/ml HIV-RNA, were randomized into two groups: the RAL-first group started with RAL (400 mg twice daily) and EFV placebo, and the EFV-first group with EFV (600 mg once daily) and RAL placebo. After 2 weeks, both groups switched to the alternate regimen. The primary endpoint was patient preference for the first or the second regimen, assessed after 4 weeks.
Results:
Fifty seven participants were enrolled with a median CD4 cell count 600/μl, and duration of previous EFV therapy 3.4 years. Fifty three participants completed the study. When asked about treatment preference after 4 weeks, 22 preferred RAL and 12 preferred EFV, whereas 19 did not express a preference. A significant difference in anxiety and stress scores favoring RAL (P = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively) was observed. Median plasma cholesterol levels decreased by 0.4 mmol/l (16 mg/dl, P < 0.001), triglycerides by 0.2 mmol/l (18 mg/dl, P = 0.036), and low-density lipoprotein by 0.2 mmol/l (8 mg/dl, P = 0.004) after replacing EFV with RAL. After study completion, 51% of patients switched to RAL.
Conclusion:
Half of patients previously on a stable EFV preferred to switch to RAL, after double-blind exposure to RAL for 2 weeks. Substitution of EFV by RAL significantly impacted on lipid levels, stress, and anxiety scores.
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

