Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A bicentric comparative and prospective study between classic photovaporization and anatomical GreenLight laser vaporization for large-volume prostatic adenomas.

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2017
Same author

The Quality of Life of Patients Treated With Robotic Versus Traditional Surgery Results From An Italian Observational Multicenter Study.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

[Not Available].

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2015
Same author

Intraluminal magnetisation of bowel by ferromagnetic particles for retraction and manipulation by magnetic probes.

Medical engineering & physics·2014
Same author

[Postoperative paralysis of peripheral nerves].

Anesthesie et analgesie·2014
Same author

Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2012
Same journal

Unexpected evolution of COVID-19 in a heart transplant patient with multimorbidity recently submitted to thoracic surgery.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

Ongoing clinical trials on axillary management.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

Axillary management after neoadjuvant treatment.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

Axillary observation alone versus sentinel node biopsy: past, present and future perspectives.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

Patient flow for the management of ostomy patients.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
Same journal

The management of "fragile" and suspected COVID-19 surgical patients during pandemic: an Italian single-center experience.

Minerva chirurgica·2020
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Laparoscopic Anatomical Right Hemihepatectomy via the In Situ Anterior Approach
05:30

Laparoscopic Anatomical Right Hemihepatectomy via the In Situ Anterior Approach

Published on: August 8, 2025

Errors in laparoscopic surgery: what surgeons should know.

R Galleano1, A Franceschi, M Ciciliot

  • 1Unit of General Surgery, S. Maria di Misericordia Hospital, Albenga, Savona, Italy2 Sant'Anna School, Pisa, Italy. raffagalleano@tin.it

Minerva Chirurgica
|May 20, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Minimal access surgery (MAS), or laparoscopic surgery, offers patient benefits but has risks. Error analysis is crucial for understanding and reducing complications in MAS procedures.

More Related Videos

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein
03:33

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein

Published on: September 27, 2024

Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver
12:27

Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver

Published on: June 16, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Laparoscopic Anatomical Right Hemihepatectomy via the In Situ Anterior Approach
05:30

Laparoscopic Anatomical Right Hemihepatectomy via the In Situ Anterior Approach

Published on: August 8, 2025

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein
03:33

Laparoscopic Left Lateral Sectionectomy: Guided by the Ligamentum Teres Hepatis and the Umbilical Fissure Vein

Published on: September 27, 2024

Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver
12:27

Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver

Published on: June 16, 2023

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Innovation
  • Patient Safety
  • Medical Error Analysis

Background:

  • Minimal Access Surgery (MAS) has evolved over two decades, offering significant patient benefits like reduced pain and shorter hospital stays.
  • Despite clinical advantages, complications related to laparoscopic approaches are well-documented, highlighting the need for systematic error analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the definition, taxonomy, and incidence of medical errors, specifically within the context of MAS.
  • To explore the root causes of adverse events in laparoscopy and examine current error study methodologies.
  • To identify key areas for human factors research to improve patient safety in laparoscopic surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on error analysis in medicine and MAS.
  • Exploration of root causes of adverse events in laparoscopic procedures.
  • Review of existing methods for studying medical errors.

Main Results:

  • Complications in MAS are not uncommon, necessitating a comprehensive system approach to error identification.
  • Understanding error mechanisms is vital for reducing incidence and improving patient outcomes.
  • Human factors research is essential for enhancing safety in laparoscopic operations.

Conclusions:

  • Awareness of error causes and mechanisms in MAS is key to reducing clinical errors.
  • A systematic approach to error analysis is required to address complications in laparoscopic surgery.
  • Further human factors research can significantly enhance patient safety during MAS procedures.