Analysis of genomic variation in non-coding elements using population-scale sequencing data from the 1000 Genomes
Xinmeng Jasmine Mu1, Zhi John Lu, Yong Kong
1Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, W.M. Keck Foundation Biotechnology Resource Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Natural selection acts on non-coding DNA, including transcription-factor binding sites and non-coding RNAs. This study reveals these regions are under significant selective pressure, especially for indels, challenging previous assumptions about genomic constraint.
Area of Science:
- Genomics and Evolutionary Biology
- Human Genome Evolution
- Population Genetics
Background:
- Non-coding genomic regions, such as transcription-factor binding sites (TF-binding sites) and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), are estimated to be under more natural selection than protein-coding sequences.
- However, these non-coding elements have received less research attention compared to coding sequences.
- Understanding selective pressures on non-coding elements is crucial for a comprehensive view of genome evolution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate and quantify selective pressure on non-coding genomic elements using next-generation sequencing data.
- To compare selective constraints across different types of genomic variations (SNPs, indels, SVs) within non-coding elements.
- To analyze how genomic properties and element subclasses influence selective pressure.
Main Methods:
- Utilized next-generation sequencing data from the 1000 Genomes Project pilot phase.
- Developed a framework to integrate variation data with non-coding elements, calculating population-based metrics.
- Employed element-aware aggregation procedures and bootstrapping techniques to analyze selective pressure across element structures.
Main Results:
- TF-binding sites and ncRNAs show less selective constraint for single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) than coding sequences (CDSs), but more than neutral regions.
- Counter-intuitively, TF-binding sites and ncRNAs exhibit stronger selective constraint for insertions/deletions (indels) than for SNPs, relative to CDSs.
- Selective pressure varies within element subclasses, correlating with genomic properties like expression levels and motif conservation; micro-RNA seed regions and their targets are under stronger selection.
Conclusions:
- Non-coding elements, particularly TF-binding sites and ncRNAs, are under significant natural selection, with distinct patterns for different variation types.
- Genomic properties and element substructures, such as expression levels and conserved motifs, modulate the extent and type of selective pressure.
- Structural variations (SVs) interact with genomic elements in unique ways, influencing their evolutionary trajectory.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Genomics
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Genome Annotation and Assembly
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Genetic Variation
Genes exist in different versions called alleles, which...

