Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026
Ultrasound Imaging of the Thoracic and Abdominal Aorta in Mice to Determine Aneurysm Dimensions
Published on: March 8, 2019
Measurements and detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Accuracy and reproducibility of a segmentation
Claude Kauffmann1, An Tang, Eric Therasse
1Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montréal and CHUM Research Center, University of Montreal, 1560 Sherbrooke Est, H2L 4M1 Montréal, Québec, Canada. claude.kauffmann@gmail.com
Purpose:
To validate the reproducibility and accuracy of a software dedicated to measure abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter, volume and growth over time.
Materials And Methods:
A software enabling AAA segmentation, diameter and volume measurement on computed tomography angiography (CTA) was tested. Validation was conducted in 28 patients with an AAA having 2 consecutive CTA examinations. The segmentation was performed twice by a senior radiologist and once by 3 medical students on all 56 CTAs. Intra and inter-observer reproducibility of D-max and volumes values were calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Systematic errors were evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis. Differences in D-max and volume growth were compared with paired Student's t-tests.
Results:
Mean D-max and volume were 49.6±6.2mm and 117.2±36.2ml for baseline and 53.6±7.9mm and 139.6±56.3ml for follow-up studies. Volume growth (17.3%) was higher than D-max progression (8.0%) between baseline and follow-up examinations (p<.0001). For the senior radiologist, intra-observer ICC of D-max and volume measurements were respectively estimated at 0.997 (≥0.991) and 1.000 (≥0.999). Overall inter-observer ICC of D-max and volume measurements were respectively estimated at 0.995 (0.990-0.997) and 0.999 (>0.999). Bland-Altman analysis showed excellent inter-reader agreement with a repeatability coefficient <3mm for D-max, <7% for relative D-max growth, <6ml for volume and <6% for relative volume growth.
Conclusion:
Software AAA volume measurements were more sensitive than AAA D-max to detect AAA growth while providing an equivalent and high reproducibility.
