Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Endoscopically assisted water perfusion esophageal manometry with minimal sedation: technique, indications, and
Rita Brun1, Kyle Staller, Sofia Viner
1Massachusetts General Hospital, Gastroenterology, Boston, MA, USA.
Goals:
To demonstrate feasibility and clinical utility of endoscopically assisted manometry (EAM).
Background:
Esophageal manometry performed without sedation is the standard for assessment of esophageal motility. However, some patients cannot tolerate the procedure with intranasal intubation. We have accumulated experience performing EAM with minimal sedation on patients who cannot tolerate standard esophageal manometry.
Study:
We report our single center experience of EAM in adult patients. Patient records were analyzed retrospectively. PROCEDURE PROTOCOL: Upper endoscopy is performed with minimal sedation to place a guide wire, over which a water perfusion manometry catheter is introduced and standard manometry protocol performed.
Results:
From 2007 to 2009, 51 patients underwent EAM, 41 (80.4%) for failed transnasal esophageal manometry and 10 (19.6%) for Zencker diverticulum, achalasia, or neurologic disease. Five patients could not tolerate the procedure despite sedation. No early or late complications were recorded and 100% of the completed procedures were diagnostic: 15 (32.6%) patients had a normal study, 13 (28.3%) were diagnosed with achalasia, 12 (26.1%) patients had low lower esophageal sphincter pressure, 10 (21.7%) patients showed ineffective esophageal motility, 3 (6.5%) patients had hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, and 1 (2.2%) patient had nutcracker esophagus. Completed procedures resulted in treatment for achalasia (33.3%), medication changes (33.3%), completion of preoperative assessment for antireflux surgery (27.7%), or no impact clinical management (11.1%). EAM had a direct clinical impact on 89% of patients.
Conclusions:
EAM is a safe, reliable, and feasible technique providing objective diagnostic information that directly impacted clinical management in many problematic patients where the standard procedure failed.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...

