Posttransplant pacemaker placement: case series and review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Mark A Thompson1, Hamang Patel
1Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.
Introduction:
Sinus node dysfunction (SND) following orthotopic heart transplantation may lead to bradycardia, atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome, syncope, and death, with 6%-23% of patients requiring pacemakers.
Methods:
Permanent pacemakers were placed in 5% of orthotopic heart transplants conducted at our institution from January 2002 to October 2008.
Results:
THREE DIFFERENT IMPLANT TECHNIQUES WERE USED OVER THIS TIME: (1) dual-chamber pacing in the donor atrium and ventricle (A(D)-V(D)) (62.5%); (2) single lead in the donor atrium (A(D)) (12.5%); and (3) dual leads placed in both donor and recipient atrium (A(R)-A(D)) (25%). Using the percentage of paced histograms recorded in the device, heart rate variability for the types of lead placements were 14% for A(D)-V(D), 35% for A(D), and 97% for A(R)-A(D).
Discussion:
The transplanted heart is characterized physiologically by autonomic denervation and chronotropic incompetence. Restoration of chronotropic competence by atrial pacing increases exercise duration and peak VO(2). Rate responsiveness can be achieved in this patient population with the placement of one lead in the remnant right atrium and one lead in the transplanted donor right atrium.
More Related Videos
08:24Establishing a Swine Model of Post-myocardial Infarction Heart Failure for Stem Cell Treatment
Published on: May 25, 2020
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017