Systematic review for paediatric metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia: a decreasing concern

Ramesh M Nataraja1, Anies A Mahomed

  • 1Department of Paediatric Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Sick Children, Brighton, UK. nataraja@doctors.org.uk

Insights

Routine contralateral exploration for pediatric unilateral inguinal hernias is not supported by evidence. Infants under 6 months and those with left-sided hernias have higher risks of metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH).

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Hernia Repair
  • Clinical Evidence Synthesis

Background:

  • Unilateral inguinal hernias in children often raise concerns about developing a metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia (MCIH).
  • This potential for a second surgery necessitates evaluating the benefits of routine contralateral exploration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review current evidence on routine contralateral exploration for pediatric unilateral inguinal hernias.
  • To identify specific patient groups at higher risk for MCIH.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive literature review was conducted using broad search terms.
  • Inclusion criteria focused on studies of pediatric unilateral inguinal hernia repair without routine contralateral exploration.
  • Statistical analysis included Chi-square tests and calculation of numbers needed to treat (NNT).

Main Results:

  • Data from 61 studies involving 49,568 patients showed an overall MCIH risk of 5.76%.
  • The NNT to prevent one MCIH through contralateral exploration is 18.
  • Increased MCIH risk was observed in patients under 6 months (NNT 9) and those with left-sided hernias (NNT 9).

Conclusions:

  • Insufficient evidence supports routine contralateral inguinal exploration for all pediatric unilateral inguinal hernias.
  • Consideration for contralateral exploration should involve parental discussion for infants <6 months and those with left-sided hernias, weighing potential benefits against risks.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos