Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Clinical course of vesicoureteral reflux in patients with hypospadias
Kwang Hyun Kim1, Hye Young Lee, Young Jae Im
1Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. swhan@yuhs.ac
Insights
Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is more common in hypospadias patients, especially infants. However, routine screening for VUR is not recommended as it typically resolves on its own.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Nephrology
Background:
- Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is more prevalent in children with hypospadias compared to healthy peers.
- Understanding the incidence and natural history of VUR in this population is crucial for appropriate management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the prevalence of VUR in patients undergoing hypospadias repair.
- To investigate the clinical course and resolution rates of VUR in this cohort.
Main Methods:
- Intraoperative cystography was performed in 338 hypospadias repair patients.
- VUR detection was followed by dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scans and voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) as indicated.
- Age and hypospadias severity were assessed alongside VUR presence.
Main Results:
- VUR was detected in 12.1% of patients, with a higher prevalence (21.8%) in infants under one year.
- VUR prevalence was significantly associated with younger age but not hypospadias type.
- Most VUR cases were low-grade, and renal scarring was infrequent; VUR resolved or improved in all follow-up cases.
Conclusions:
- While VUR is more common in hypospadias patients, routine screening is not necessary.
- The high spontaneous resolution rate and low incidence of renal scarring suggest conservative management is appropriate.
Objectives:
The prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in hypospadic patients is reportedly higher than in healthy children. We investigated the prevalence and the clinical course of VUR in hypospadic patients.
Methods:
We carried out intraoperative cystography to detect VUR in 338 patients who underwent hypospadias repair. Age, severity of hypospadias and the presence of VUR were investigated. A dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan and follow-up voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) were carried out if VUR was detected.
Results:
VUR was detected in 41 patients (12.1%). Of 156 patients who were younger than 1 year-of-age, 34 (21.8%) were found to have VUR. The prevalence of VUR was significantly higher in patients younger than 1year (P<0.001), but was not associated with hypospadias type (P=0.212). The reflux grades were I, II and III in 6, 52 and 1 renal units, respectively. Renal scarring was shown in one of 36 patients. Follow-up VCUG was carried out in 30 patients at a mean of 14.28±3.89months, and reflux resolved in 27 and improved from grade II to grade I in three patients.
Conclusions:
Although its prevalence is higher in hypospadic children than in healthy children, it is not necessary to screen for VUR in hypospadic patients, because it is likely to be low-grade and to resolve in most cases.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Pyelonephritis I: Introduction
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection II: Pathophysiology
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
