Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026
06:04
Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Hearing evaluation in preeclamptic patients.
Ismail Ozdemir1, Suleyman Yilmaz, Mustafa Albayrak
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duzce University School of Medicine, Duzce, Turkey. drismailozdemir@yahoo.com
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
|May 25, 2011
Summary
Preeclampsia, a pregnancy complication, does not significantly impact hearing function in most cases. While some minor changes were detected, hearing remained within normal limits for preeclamptic women.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Obstetrics
- Neurology
Background:
- Preeclampsia is a serious pregnancy complication.
- Potential effects of preeclampsia on maternal sensory functions are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of preeclampsia on hearing.
- To compare hearing levels in preeclamptic versus healthy pregnant women.
Main Methods:
- Pure-tone audiometry and brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEPs) were used.
- 30 preeclamptic patients and 38 healthy pregnant women were studied.
- Hearing was evaluated using established audiological tests.
Main Results:
- Pure-tone audiometry showed statistically significant differences between groups (p < 0.05).
- These differences were not clinically significant, with all thresholds below 20 dB.
- Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEPs) did not show significant differences (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Preeclampsia does not appear to significantly impair hearing function.
- Hearing is generally unaffected unless severe vascular complications occur.
Related Concept Videos
01:17Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the Apical Pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for:
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
When assessing blood pressure (BP), healthcare professionals must consider various factors and potential unexpected outcomes to ensure accurate readings and provide proper patient care. Adhering to these guidelines is essential to achieving the most reliable results.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.