Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

State of the Art Cranial Ultrasound Imaging in Neonates
Published on: February 2, 2015
Ultrasound in the selective screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip
1Department of Radiology, West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth, UK. asimafaq@doctors.org.uk
Insights
Early ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in at-risk infants identified few cases requiring intervention. While ultrasound adjusted follow-up for many, it led to only one Pavlik Harness treatment, questioning its resource viability.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can lead to long-term complications like chronic pain and arthritis.
- Infants with risk factors such as family history, breech delivery, or hip instability require early detection for optimal outcomes.
- Clinical examination alone is insufficient for timely DDH diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and resource implications of targeted ultrasound screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in at-risk newborns.
- To determine the yield of ultrasound in identifying infants requiring intervention compared to clinical examination.
Main Methods:
- Prospective screening of 5772 infants born between March 2005 and October 2006.
- Risk factor assessment (family history, breech delivery, hip instability) identified 200 infants for hip ultrasound.
- Ultrasound (Harkness method with Terjesen measurements) performed by specialists, with orthopedic surgeon assessment blinded to initial ultrasound findings.
Main Results:
- Of 200 at-risk infants, 400 hip ultrasounds were performed.
- Ultrasound findings led to management changes in 51 infants (25.5%), primarily adjusting follow-up timing or type.
- Only 6 infants (3%) demonstrated hip dysplasia on ultrasound, with 5 detected on clinical exam; one required Pavlik Harness treatment solely identified by ultrasound.
Conclusions:
- Targeted ultrasound screening in at-risk infants resulted in only one intervention (Pavlik Harness).
- While ultrasound adjusted follow-up for 18.5% of infants, the low intervention rate prompts discussion on the cost-effectiveness and necessity of universal ultrasound screening.
- Clinical examination remains crucial, but its limitations in diagnosing DDH necessitate a balanced approach to screening strategies.
Introduction:
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) can result in chronic pain, gait abnormalities and degenerative arthritis. Infants with a family history, Breech delivery or unstable/"clicking" of the hip on examination are at higher risk. The goal is to detect cases early enough for normal hip development and function by the end of adolescence, but clinical examination alone is ineffective.
Materials And Methods:
All infants born at the West Middlesex University Hospital, Isle-worth, U.K., between 3/3/2005 and 21/10/2006 underwent prospective clinical screening to reveal risk factors of unstable hip on examination, family history of DDH and Breech delivery. Infants with risk factors underwent static and dynamic ultrasound of the hips (Harke's method with Terjesen measurements), performed by a consultant radiologist or sonographer. The infant was then examined by an Orthopaedic Surgeon who was blinded to the ultrasound findings until after creating a management plan.
Results:
5772 infants were born during the study period. 200 (3.5%) at-risk infants were identified, resulting in 400 hip ultrasounds. Following review of ultrasound findings, the majority of cases (163/200, 81.5%) lead to no change in management. Change in timing or type of clinical follow up occurred in 31 cases with normal ultrasounds and 20 cases with abnormal (immature hip) ultrasounds. Dysplasia was demonstrated in 6 infants (3%) on ultrasound, who were treated with Parvlik Harness. Of these, only 5 were detected on examination. Therefore, the ultrasound findings lead to 1 intervention with Parvlik Harness which would have otherwise gone undiagnosed from clinical examination.
Conclusion:
Whereas type and timing of follow up was adjusted in 18.5% of the at-risk infants, targeted screening of at-risk with ultrasound lead to only one intervention. This encourages discussion on the resource implication and viability of ultrasound screening, as only one from two hundred lead to an intervention.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called a...
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...
