Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
Principal component approach in variance component estimation for international sire evaluation.
Anna-Maria Tyrisevä1, Karin Meyer, W Freddy Fikse
1Biotechnology and Food Research, Biometrical Genetics, MTT Agrifood Research Finland, 31600 Jokioinen, Finland. anna-maria.tyriseva@mtt.fi
Principal component approaches improve dairy cattle breeding value estimation for international comparisons. These methods offer accurate and efficient solutions for complex genetic analyses, enhancing global breeding programs.
Area of Science:
- Animal Breeding and Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Statistical Genetics
Background:
- The global dairy cattle breeding industry requires reliable, internationally comparable breeding values.
- Interbull (International Bull Evaluation Service) was established to provide these international breeding values.
- Estimating parameters for Multiple-Trait Across Country Evaluations (MACE) is complex due to over-parameterized genetic covariance matrices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare two principal component approaches for estimating variance components in MACE.
- To evaluate the utility of the bottom-up principal component approach for determining covariance matrix rank.
- To address challenges in estimating parameters for MACE in dairy cattle.
Main Methods:
- Comparison of a direct principal component (PC) REML approach with a bottom-up PC REML approach.
- Utilizing real datasets for variance component estimation in MACE.
- Sequential addition of traits in the bottom-up PC approach to identify significant genetic principal components.
Main Results:
- Both principal component approaches are effective for large, multi-country MACE models.
- These methods can replace current practices of subset analyses for covariance component estimation.
- Appropriate rank selection is crucial; too low a rank causes bias, while too high a rank increases errors and computation time.
Conclusions:
- Both principal component approaches yield accurate estimations and enable parsimonious random regression MACE models.
- The bottom-up PC approach identifies rank without prior knowledge.
- The direct PC approach is faster if the rank is predetermined.
Related Concept Videos
Variance
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Vector Algebra: Method of Components
In many applications, the magnitudes and directions of...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Variation
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
