Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring01:23

Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring

Holter monitoring is a continuous electrocardiography (ECG) recording that tracks the heart's electrical activity over an extended period, generally 24 to 48 hours. This noninvasive diagnostic tool detects irregular heart rhythms that may not be captured during a standard ECG performed in a clinical setting.DeviceThe Holter monitor is a portable, small device connected to several electrodes on the patient's chest. These electrodes detect the heart's electrical signals and transmit them to the...
Pulse rhythm01:30

Pulse rhythm

Pulse rhythm refers to the pattern of pulsations within specific intervals, offering valuable insights into the regularity or irregularity of the heart's beats as observed through the pattern of pulsation within specific intervals. A regular pulse exhibits a consistent heart rate with uniform waveforms and pulsation force, variations of which can be classified as normal, weak, or bounding.
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Physical Activity Assessment Using Wearable Sensors (PAAWS) Dataset: Labeled Laboratory and Free-living Accelerometer Data.

Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies·2026
Same author

Towards Practical, Best Practice Video Annotation to Support Human Activity Recognition.

Annotation of real-world data for artificial intelligence systems : 9th international workshop, ARDUOUS 2025, Bologna Italy, October 25-26, 2025, proceedings. International Workshop on Annotation of Real-World Data for Artificial Intell...·2026
Same author

Ischemic preconditioning with active reperfusion does not improve high-intensity intermittent exercise in youth team sport players.

European journal of applied physiology·2026
Same author

Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and health-related quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis.

Disability and rehabilitation·2025
Same author

Toward AI-Driven Precision Measurement of Cognition, Behavior, and Psychological Function in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease-Related Dementias.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2025
Same author

An Examination of Efficiency during Walking in Children and Adults.

Pediatric exercise science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
06:51

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.

Jeffer E Sasaki1, Dinesh John, Patty S Freedson

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, United States.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
|May 28, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Activity monitors ActiGraph GT3X and GT1M show differences in antero-posterior and vector magnitude counts, but not vertical counts. New tri-axial vector magnitude cut-points are proposed for classifying physical activity intensity.

More Related Videos

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
06:51

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Exercise Physiology
  • Wearable Technology

Background:

  • ActiGraph devices are widely used for objective physical activity assessment.
  • Comparing data between different ActiGraph models (GT1M and GT3X) is crucial for data consistency.
  • Accurate classification of physical activity intensity is essential for health research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare activity counts between ActiGraph GT3X and GT1M during treadmill walking/running.
  • To develop tri-axial vector magnitude (VM3) cut-points for classifying physical activity intensity.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty participants performed treadmill exercise at four speeds (4.8-12 km/h) wearing both GT3X and GT1M devices.
  • Vertical (VT), antero-posterior (AP) counts, and 2-axis vector magnitude (VM2) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA.
  • Bland-Altman plots assessed inter-monitor agreement; linear regression developed VM3 cut-points based on oxygen consumption.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in VT activity counts between monitors.
  • AP and VM2 counts were significantly higher (p<0.01) from GT1M than GT3X at most speeds.
  • High agreement for VT counts, but not for AP and VM2 counts.
  • Proposed VM3 cut-points: moderate (2690-6166), hard (6167-9642), very hard (>9642) counts/min.

Conclusions:

  • Direct comparison of GT1M and GT3X data is not recommended when using AP or VM2 axes due to lack of congruence.
  • The developed VM3 cut-points offer a standardized method for classifying physical activity intensity in future research.