Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

06:09
Quantification of Tumor Cell Adhesion in Lymph Node Cryosections
Published on: February 9, 2020
Experience with local lymph node assay performance standards using standard radioactivity and nonradioactive cell
David Basketter1, Susanne N Kolle, Arnhild Schrage
1DABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook, UK.
Journal of Applied Toxicology : JAT
|May 28, 2011
Summary
The nonradioactive lymph node cell count (LNCC) assay closely matches the standard radioactive local lymph node assay (LLNA) for identifying skin sensitizers. This validation supports LNCC as a reliable alternative for skin sensitization testing.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Dermatology
- Immunotoxicology
Background:
- The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is the gold standard for identifying skin sensitizers.
- Nonradioactive alternatives to LLNA require validation against established performance standards (PS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate a lymph node cell count (LNCC) variant of the LLNA against harmonized minimum performance standards (PS).
- To assess the concordance between radioactive LLNA and nonradioactive LNCC measurements for skin sensitizers.
Main Methods:
- The LNCC assay was performed in parallel with the standard radioactive LLNA.
- Twenty-two performance standards (PS) chemicals were tested to determine threshold concentrations (EC3).
- Results from both methods were compared against established PS criteria.
Main Results:
- The LNCC assay demonstrated high agreement with the radioactive LLNA, with 21 out of 22 chemicals yielding concordant results.
- Minor discrepancies were observed for 2-mercaptobenzothiazole, methylmethacrylate, and nickel chloride.
- The LNCC method showed good accordance with radioactive measurements for most PS chemicals.
Conclusions:
- The lymph node cell count (LNCC) assay is a reliable nonradioactive alternative to the standard LLNA for skin sensitization testing.
- Validation against PS indicates LNCC can meet regulatory acceptance criteria.
- Careful analysis is needed when comparing results with published PS data.

