Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Analysis of the singlet-triplet splitting computed by the density functional theory-broken-symmetry method: is it an
Nicolas Onofrio1, Jean-Marie Mouesca
1Laboratoire de Résonances Magnétiques, Service de Chimie Inorganique et Biologique UMR-E 3 CEA-UJF, Institut de Nanosciences et Cryogénie, CEA-Grenoble, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France. nicolas.onofrio@cea.fr
Abstract:
We derive an analytical expression of the density functional theory (DFT)-broken-symmetry (BS) estimation J(BS) of the singlet-triplet gap at the "3 sites-4 electrons" level, that is, two S = (1)/(2) metallic sites + one diamagnetic bridge orbital. As originally designed by Noodleman and Davidson (Chem. Phys.1986, 109, 131), J(BS) contains the residual ferromagnetic contribution, single ligand-to-metal and metal-to-metal charge-transfer terms, but no double ligand-to-metal charge-transfer terms or intra/interligand spin-polarization terms. As revealed by the present analysis, the triplet and BS states computed by DFT differ, not only perturbatively (as expected) because of the various physical mechanisms involved (i.e., differential charge-transfer terms) but mainly because of a spurious and unphysical symmetry breaking of the bridge orbitals in the BS state. We examine the consequences of such a difference by deriving two analytical expressions of the exchange coupling constant, one from the BS orbitals designed to match J(BS) and another one from triplet orbitals only. Following and extending on the first paper in the series (J. Phys. Chem. A 2010, 114, 6149), we propose a simple procedure to extract appropriate parameters filling in our analytical expressions. Moreover, we derive the equivalent "3 sites-4 electrons" exchange coupling constant in the configuration-interaction approach, J(CI), for the purpose of comparison. These analytical expressions have been applied to various copper dimers and compared to experimental values.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
¹H NMR Signal Multiplicity: Splitting Patterns

