Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact01:03

Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact

Drug control governance involves the oversight and regulation of pharmaceuticals to ensure their safety and efficacy while preventing illegal drug use and trafficking. Regulatory bodies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Union's European Medicines Agency (EMA), play a central role in this process. These agencies evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs before they can be marketed. They fund clinical trials and assess the benefits and risks associated with a...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions01:15

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Costs of autism spectrum disorders and access to services in Spain.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Assessing the trustworthiness of health guidelines recommendations: the transparent, rigorous, useable, standardized, and trustworthy guide (TRUSTGUIDES) tools development.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Effect of a Personalized Mobile Health Intervention Using Artificial Intelligence (the WARIFA App) Versus a Nonpersonalized Intervention on User-Defined Objectives, Healthy Lifestyles, and Management of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Perceived person-centered care and its association with outcomes in women with dyspareunia: a cross-sectional study.

The journal of sexual medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using OPTION-12 and OPTION-5.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2026
Same author

Amyloid-beta-targeting monoclonal antibodies for people with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

Shared decision making in Spain: current state and future perspectives.

Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez1, Amado Rivero-Santana, Jeanette Perez-Ramos

  • 1Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), Tenerife, Spain. lperperr@gobiernodecanarias.org

Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen
|May 31, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Shared decision making (SDM) and patient decision aids (PtDAs) are increasingly recognized in Spain's healthcare system. Further integration into law, professional training, and patient awareness is needed for full implementation.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Patient Engagement
  • Clinical Decision Making

Background:

  • Growing recognition of patient values and preferences in clinical decisions within the Spanish National Health System (NHS).
  • Increasing importance of shared decision making (SDM) as a communication and decision-making model in Spain.
  • NHS funding for patient decision aids (PtDAs) through Health Technology Assessment Agencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the current status and future prospects of shared decision making (SDM) and patient decision aids (PtDAs) in the Spanish National Health System (NHS).
  • To identify barriers and facilitators for the integration of SDM and PtDAs into routine healthcare.
  • To provide recommendations for the future development and implementation of SDM in Spain.

Main Methods:

  • The study reviews the current landscape of SDM and PtDAs in Spain.
  • It examines the integration of these tools into healthcare policy, professional education, and patient awareness.
  • Analysis of existing initiatives and identification of gaps in implementation.

Main Results:

  • While SDM and PtDAs are gaining traction and funding, they are not yet legally mandated or standardized in routine care.
  • Both patients and healthcare professionals demonstrate limited familiarity with patients' rights to participate in decision-making.
  • The development of high-quality PtDAs is ongoing, but dissemination and training strategies require reinforcement.

Conclusions:

  • The future of SDM in Spain is promising, with ongoing development of patient decision aids.
  • Key actions include continued production of quality PtDAs, enhanced dissemination to patients, and robust training for professionals.
  • Legal reforms and standardized implementation are crucial for embedding SDM into the core of healthcare services.