Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...
Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How foundation models will revolutionize robot swarms.

Science robotics·2026
Same author

Best-of-n decision making by human groups.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Collective decision making by embodied neural agents.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Socially driven negative feedback regulates activity and energy use in ant colonies.

PLoS computational biology·2024
Same author

Self-organizing nervous systems for robot swarms.

Science robotics·2024
Same author

Action-based confidence sharing and collective decision making.

iScience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Self-organized discrimination of resources.

Alexandre Campo1, Simon Garnier, Olivier Dédriche

  • 1IRIDIA-CoDE (Institut de Recherches Interdisciplinaires et de Développements en Intelligence Artificielle, Department of Computer and Decision Engineering), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. acampo@ulb.ac.be

Plos One
|June 1, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Insect colonies optimize resource selection by adjusting their switching behavior based on local population density. This self-organized mechanism ensures efficient resource use and minimizes conflict, applicable to distributed decision-making tools.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Collective Intelligence
  • Social Insect Behavior

Background:

  • Social insects face challenges in selecting optimal resources, balancing abundance, exploitation costs, and inter-colony competition.
  • Previous studies on cockroaches and ants highlight complex decision-making processes in resource exploitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and analyze a novel behavioral mechanism for resource selection in insect colonies.
  • To explain how individual behavior scales up to efficient group-level decision-making.
  • To explore the implications for distributed decision-making systems.

Main Methods:

  • Modeling a behavioral mechanism where individuals adjust resource-switching probability based on local conspecific density.
  • Analyzing the emergent collective behavior of the group in resource selection.
  • Investigating the impact of group size on resource discrimination and flexibility.

Main Results:

  • Individuals aggregate at the smallest resource capable of supporting the entire colony, reducing costs and competition.
  • Group-level resource discrimination improves with increasing colony size.
  • The collective decision-making process is flexible, allowing rapid adaptation to new resources.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed mechanism enables efficient, self-organized resource exploitation in insect colonies without centralized control.
  • Minimal individual cognitive requirements suggest this mechanism is widespread in social species.
  • This model offers insights for developing robust, distributed decision-making algorithms.