Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This phenomenon...

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...

Test for Homogeneity

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can be stated as...

Bonferroni Test

Bonferroni Test

The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Separability and identifiability as primary obstacles to substantively useful mediation analysis.

European journal of epidemiology·2026

Same author

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Identify Emergency Department Patients at Increased Risk of New or Progressive Acute Kidney Injury.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open·2026

Same author

Best practices for moving from correlation to causation in ecological research.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Reducing home infusion CLABSI through a dashboard and toolkit implementation.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2026

Same author

Resurrecting complete-case analysis: a defense.

American journal of epidemiology·2026

Same author

Enhancing Survival Prediction After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Using Machine Learning.

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

A new criterion for confounder selection.

Tyler J VanderWeele¹, Ilya Shpitser

¹Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. tvanderw@hsph.harvard.edu

|June 2, 2011

Summary

We introduce a new method for selecting confounders when causal pathways are unclear. This approach ensures effective confounding control by identifying covariates that influence treatment or outcomes, regardless of the underlying structure.

More Related Videos

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Area of Science:

Causal inference
Epidemiology
Statistical modeling

Background:

Confounder selection is critical for valid causal inference in observational studies.
Existing methods often require extensive knowledge of the full causal structure, which is frequently unavailable.
Limited knowledge of causal relationships between covariates complicates accurate confounding control.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel, practical criterion for confounder selection under conditions of unknown causal structure.
To develop a method that requires only limited, ascertainable information about covariates.
To demonstrate the robustness and superiority of the proposed criterion compared to existing methods.

Main Methods:

The proposed criterion involves assessing each pretreatment covariate for its causal relationship with the treatment and the outcome.
Covariates identified as causes of either the treatment, the outcome, or both are selected for confounder control.
The method leverages formal theory of causal diagrams for rigorous proof but is designed for intuitive application.

Main Results:

The proposed criterion guarantees that if any set of covariates can control for confounding, the set selected by this criterion will also suffice.
This property ensures effective confounding control even when the complete causal graph is unknown.
The study demonstrates that commonly used confounder selection criteria do not possess this desirable property.

Conclusions:

The new criterion offers a reliable and straightforward approach to confounder selection in situations with limited causal knowledge.
Its application is simple: include covariates that are causes of the treatment or the outcome.
This method enhances the validity of causal inference by ensuring adequate control for confounding.