Usefulness of MRA-DWI mismatch in neuroendovascular therapy for acute cerebral infarction

I Deguchi1, T Dembo, T Fukuoka

  • 1Department of Neurology and Cerebrovascular Medicine, Saitama International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan. ideguchi@saitama-med.ac.jp

Abstract

Insights

The MR angiography (MRA)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch (MDM) may predict outcomes in acute cerebral infarction patients receiving neuroendovascular therapy. MDM-positive patients showed better reperfusion and clinical responses compared to MDM-negative patients.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Interventional Cardiology

Background:

  • Acute cerebral infarction requires timely intervention.
  • Neuroendovascular therapy is a crucial treatment option for selected patients.
  • Predictive markers for treatment success are essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of MR angiography (MRA)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch (MDM) in predicting outcomes.
  • To assess the effectiveness of neuroendovascular therapy in patients with acute cerebral infarction.
  • To determine if MDM can guide therapeutic decisions and prognosis.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 14 patients with anterior circulation deficit treated with neuroendovascular therapy within 3 hours of stroke onset.
  • Definition of MRA-DWI mismatch (MDM): MDM (+) defined as major artery lesion present and DWI-Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≥6; MDM (-) defined as major artery lesion present and DWI-ASPECTS <6.
  • Assessment of reperfusion rates and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days post-treatment.

Main Results:

  • Reperfusion was achieved in 64% of patients (9/14).
  • In the reperfusion group, MDM (+) patients (n=5) had a favorable clinical response (mRS 0-2 in 60%) compared to MDM (-) patients (n=4) (mRS 0-2 in 0%).
  • In the non-reperfusion group, outcomes were poor regardless of MDM status, though MDM (+) patients (n=3) showed slightly better results (mRS 0-2 in 33%) than MDM (-) patients (n=2) (mRS 0-2 in 0%).

Conclusions:

  • Neuroendovascular therapy can lead to good outcomes in acute cerebral infarction.
  • The presence of MRA-DWI mismatch (MDM) is associated with better outcomes after successful reperfusion.
  • MDM status may serve as a useful prognostic indicator for patients undergoing neuroendovascular therapy.

Related Concept Videos