Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...

The Scientific Method

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.

Structuralism

Structuralism

Structuralism, an early psychological theory developed by Wilhelm Wundt and his student Edward Bradford Titchener, sought to dissect the human mind into its most fundamental components. Wundt's groundbreaking work in his laboratory set the stage for Titchener to define structuralism's goal as cataloging the "atoms" of the mind—sensations, images, and feelings—akin to how chemists identify elements of matter.
Titchener's approach to structuralism was unique. He employed introspection, a method...

Functionalism

Functionalism

William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce were instrumental in founding functional psychology, which draws heavily from Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. This theory suggests that individual traits, including behaviors, are adapted to their environments through natural selection. At the heart of functionalism is the concept of adaptation, meaning that a trait enhances an individual's chances of survival and reproduction.
James envisioned psychology's role as...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Over 1000 terms have been used to describe evidence synthesis: a scoping review.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2025

Same author

The Dark Side of Rapid Reviews: A Retreat From Systematic Approaches and the Need for Clear Expectations and Reporting.

Annals of internal medicine·2022

Same author

Detection of duck circovirus in Great Britain.

The Veterinary record·2022

Same author

The Pandora's Box of Evidence Synthesis and the case for a living Evidence Synthesis Taxonomy.

BMJ evidence-based medicine·2022

Same author

Catalin Tufanaru, 1970-2021.

JBI evidence synthesis·2021

Same author

The ripple effect of evidence implementation: a descriptive evaluation of JBI's Evidence-based Clinical Fellowship Program.

JBI evidence implementation·2021

Same journal

Intermittent iron supplementation for reducing anaemia and its associated impairments in adolescent and adult menstruating women.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020

Same journal

The chameleon effect: adapting, advancing and aligning.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020

Same journal

Interventions to ensure medication safety in acute care: an umbrella review.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020

Same journal

Development of a novel patient focussed symptom severity index for use in assessing and treating inflammatory conditions of the lactating breast: a Delphi study.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020

Same journal

Completeness of intervention reporting in neurology randomized controlled trials: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020

Same journal

The Work Organisation Assessment Questionnaire: validation for use with community nurses and paramedics.

International journal of evidence-based healthcare·2020

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Scientists, postmodernists or fascists?

¹The Joanna Briggs Institute, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, and The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

|June 3, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A postmodernist critique of evidence-based healthcare sparked defensive reactions. This paper argues for scholarly critique over attacks on journals and organizations promoting evidence-based medicine, emphasizing constructive debate for global health improvement.

More Related Videos

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

A Naturalistic Setup for Presenting Real People and Live Actions in Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Studies

Published on: August 4, 2023

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Perspectives on Neuroscience

Published on: July 31, 2007

Area of Science:

Health Sciences
Evidence-Based Healthcare
Scientific Discourse Analysis

Background:

A provocative paper critiquing evidence-based healthcare using postmodernist theory generated significant controversy.
Defensive responses in media attacked the paper and associated journals/organizations rather than engaging in scholarly critique.
This reaction highlights a tension between postmodern critiques and the established evidence-based healthcare movement.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a scholarly refutation of the uninformed attacks on the "Deconstructing the evidence-based discourse in health sciences" paper.
To analyze why proponents of evidence-based healthcare attacked the journal and organization instead of critiquing the paper's arguments.
To advocate for rigorous scholarly engagement with critiques of evidence-based healthcare.

Main Methods:

Scholarly argumentation to refute claims made against the paper and its proponents.
Analysis of the nature and motivation behind the reactionary responses.
Examination of the validity of postmodernist critiques within the healthcare context.

Main Results:

The attacks on the paper and associated institutions lacked scholarly rigor and demonstrated unfamiliarity with the journal's content.
Defenders of evidence-based healthcare engaged in ad hominem attacks rather than substantive critique.
The postmodernist critique, while widespread, can be addressed through considered, scholarly debate.

Conclusions:

Ill-informed, reactionary responses hinder the productive development of evidence for global health.
Scholarly engagement with diverse perspectives, including postmodern critiques, is essential for advancing evidence-based healthcare.
The controversy underscores the need for a more nuanced and intellectually honest discourse surrounding evidence in health sciences.