Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

05:12
Using Virtual Reality to Transfer Motor Skill Knowledge from One Hand to Another
Published on: September 18, 2017
Simulator training to automaticity leads to improved skill transfer compared with traditional proficiency-based
Dimitrios Stefanidis1, Mark W Scerbo, Paul N Montero
1Carolinas Simulation Center, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA. Dimitrios.Stefanidis@carolinashealthcare.org
Annals of Surgery
|June 4, 2011
Summary
Simulator training to automaticity improves surgical skills better than proficiency-based training. This approach enhances operating room performance by ensuring complete skill acquisition and transfer for surgical trainees.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Education
- Medical Simulation
- Skill Acquisition
Background:
- Simulator training enhances surgical skills, but skill transfer to the operating room is often incomplete.
- Secondary task metrics can assess multitasking ability (automaticity) and indicate learning completion.
- Automaticity training may improve performance assessment and skill transfer in surgical simulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that novices achieve better operating room performance after simulator training to automaticity compared to traditional proficiency-based training.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of secondary task metrics in assessing surgical skill automaticity.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial enrolled 30 novices, randomized into intervention (n=20) and control (n=10) groups.
- The intervention group underwent simulator suturing training to proficiency, then to automaticity using a secondary task, with retesting on an operating room model.
- Performance scores were compared between groups during testing sessions on a live porcine fundoplication model.
Main Results:
- Intervention participants achieved proficiency in 54 ± 14 repetitions and automaticity in an additional 109 ± 57 repetitions.
- Operating room performance scores were significantly higher after automaticity training (345) compared to proficiency-based training (220; P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- Simulator training to automaticity, while time-consuming, is superior to proficiency-based training for surgical skill acquisition and transfer.
- Implementing secondary task metrics for automaticity assessment in simulator training can enhance learning and skill transfer.
- Automaticity training is a more effective paradigm for surgical skill development than traditional proficiency-based methods.
