Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Limit Laws II

Limit Laws II

In calculus, limit laws serve as foundational tools for evaluating the behavior of functions as inputs approach specific values. Among these, the laws concerning quotients, powers, and roots are particularly useful in breaking down complex expressions.The Quotient Law allows the limit of a division between two functions to be calculated by dividing their individual limits, provided the limit of the denominator exists and is not zero. For example,The Power Law states that the limit of a function...

Law of Effect

Law of Effect

B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle boxes...

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.

Limit Laws I

Limit Laws I

Limit laws provide essential tools for analyzing how functions behave as their input approaches a specific value. These laws are particularly useful when dealing with combinations of functions, provided the individual limits exist. The Sum and Difference Laws state that the limit of the sum or difference of two functions equals the sum or difference of their respective limits:The Product Law asserts that the limit of the product of two functions equals the product of their individual limits:A...

Sources of Law

Sources of Law

Laws form the essential rules set by governing authorities to shape and control societal behavior. In nursing, laws guide actions, safeguard patient rights, define nurses' scope of practice, and maintain professional standards. Understanding the legal framework governing nursing involves recognizing four primary sources of law: constitutional, statutory, administrative (regulatory), and common law.
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...

Stokes' Law

Stokes' Law

Viscous forces, like friction, are intermolecular forces that resist the relative motion of molecules over each other. When a solid body moves through a liquid, viscous forces drag it in the opposite direction. The force's magnitude depends on the solid's shape and size, as well as its speed and the liquid's coefficient of viscosity, density and temperature.
The expression for the force on a solid spherical object in a fluid is called Stokes' law. Stokes' law is valid only for low Reynolds...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same journal

Federal/state tensions in fulfilling Medicaid's purpose.

Annals of health law·2012

Same journal

New options to integrate care and financing for persons dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.

Annals of health law·2012

Same journal

The challenges of reform for Medicaid managed care.

Annals of health law·2012

Same journal

Post-reform Medicaid before the court: discordant advocacy reflects conflicting attitudes.

Annals of health law·2012

Same journal

Access to health care. Foreword.

Annals of health law·2012

Same journal

Can the FDA improve oversight of foreign clinical trials?: Closing the information gap and moving towards a globalized regulatory scheme.

Annals of health law·2012

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

The Stark Law in retrospect.

Patrick A Sutton¹

¹Chuhak & Tecson, P.C., LL.M., Health Law, Loyola University Chicago School of Law, USA.

Annals of Health Law

|June 7, 2011

Summary

The Stark Law aims to prevent Medicare fraud and physician self-referral abuse. However, its complexity may hinder medical innovation and physician entrepreneurship, necessitating payment reform alongside targeted regulation.

Area of Science:

Health Policy and Law
Medical Economics
Bioethics

Background:

The Stark Law regulates physician self-referral arrangements to protect the Medicare program and prevent overutilization of services.
Concerns exist regarding the law's complexity and its potential to stifle physician innovation and entrepreneurialism in healthcare delivery.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the Stark Law's phases and regulations in achieving their policy goals.
To analyze the impact of the Stark Law on physician self-referral, market competition, and healthcare integration.
To propose solutions for mitigating physician self-referral abuse while simplifying Stark Law compliance.

Main Methods:

Policy analysis of the Stark Law's objectives and regulatory evolution.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

Examination of the law's effects on medical market competitiveness.

Ethical considerations of physician self-referral practices.

Main Results:

The current Stark Law framework's effectiveness in preventing overutilization and protecting Medicare is debated.
Legislation may inadvertently impede physician innovation and integrated care delivery.
Existing regulations present significant complexity and breadth, posing challenges for compliance.

Conclusions:

Addressing inappropriate physician self-referral and overutilization requires targeting abusive practices and realigning financial incentives.
Reforming current healthcare payment mechanisms is crucial for cultural change beyond specific regulatory adjustments.
Simplifying Stark Law regulations is necessary while maintaining safeguards against abuse.