Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility of Early Enteral Nutrition in Patients Under Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Acute medicine & surgery·2026
Same author

Serum Amyloid β Oligomer May Predict Treatment Response in Middle-Aged and Late-Life Patients With Depression.

Neuropsychopharmacology reports·2026
Same author

Hemorrhagic shock and encephalopathy syndrome with hyper-inflammation and elevation of IL-6 and GDF-15 following COVID-19: A case report.

IDCases·2025
Same author

Fecal microbiota transplantation for Crohn's disease-like intestinal lesions arising after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

International journal of hematology·2025
Same author

Lung microbiota of patients with ARDS due to coronavirus disease 2019 receiving ECMO.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Longitudinal MRI study over 20 years of cervical posterior extensor muscle area in asymptomatic subjects.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

OpenIMC: an open-source platform for analyzing single-cell and spatial proteomics by imaging mass cytometry.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

NAP: an open source pipeline for cross-domain microbiome profiling using Nanopore sequencing-derived amplicon data.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SurvGME: an R package for survival analysis with graphical and measurement error models.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SimMapNet: a Bayesian framework for gene regulatory network inference using gene ontology similarities as external hint.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Dual channel drug-drug interactions extraction based on cross attention.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

FeSseqdb: a curated sequence-level database and interpretable machine learning framework for identifying iron-sulfur proteins.

BMC bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Evaluating methods for ranking differentially expressed genes applied to microArray quality control data.

Koji Kadota1, Kentaro Shimizu

  • 1Agricultural Bioinformatics Research Unit, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Japan. kadota@bi.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp

BMC Bioinformatics
|June 7, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The weighted average difference (WAD) method demonstrates superior sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility across multiple microarray platforms for ranking differentially expressed genes (DEGs). This finding offers a universally applicable recommendation for gene expression analysis.

More Related Videos

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples
07:30

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

DNA Microarrays: Sample Quality Control, Array Hybridization and Scanning
09:27

DNA Microarrays: Sample Quality Control, Array Hybridization and Scanning

Published on: March 15, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
10:10

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2

Published on: September 18, 2021

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples
07:30

Optimization for Sequencing and Analysis of Degraded FFPE-RNA Samples

Published on: June 8, 2020

DNA Microarrays: Sample Quality Control, Array Hybridization and Scanning
09:27

DNA Microarrays: Sample Quality Control, Array Hybridization and Scanning

Published on: March 15, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Gene Expression Analysis
  • Statistical Genomics

Background:

  • Evaluating statistical methods for ranking differentially expressed genes (DEGs) is crucial for sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility.
  • Previous studies focused solely on Affymetrix GeneChip data.
  • A broader evaluation across multiple microarray platforms is needed to determine platform-specific suitability and inter-platform reproducibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare eight gene ranking methods across diverse microarray platforms.
  • To identify methods with high sensitivity, specificity, and inter-platform reproducibility.
  • To provide universally applicable recommendations for DEG analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) datasets from five manufacturers (Affymetrix, Applied Biosystems, Agilent, GE Healthcare, Illumina).
  • Assessed sensitivity and specificity using the area under the curve (AUC).
  • Evaluated intra- and inter-platform reproducibility using percentages of overlapping genes (POGs).

Main Results:

  • The weighted average difference (WAD), rank products (RP), and intensity-based moderated t statistic (ibmT) methods generally performed best in terms of AUC.
  • WAD consistently showed the highest percentages of overlapping genes (POGs) across all microarray platforms, indicating superior reproducibility.
  • High intra- and inter-platform reproducibility of WAD was also observed at the biological function level.

Conclusions:

  • The findings from the MAQC benchmark data are consistent with previous studies using Affymetrix data.
  • The weighted average difference (WAD) method is recommended for its robust performance and high reproducibility across different microarray platforms.
  • Recommendations based on MAQC data are likely universally applicable for gene expression analysis.